I realized just yesterday that I had an FT-worthy bunch of articles, so I'm nominating it for FTC. The season was unusual for how quiet it was, although one of the storms was one of the deadliest in the basin. Hope you like it. ♬♩
Hurricanehink (
talk) 14:45, 8 April 2010 (UTC)reply
Unlike Henriette, it didn't make landfall, and unlike Juliette, it didn't have much of a meteorological history. There's not really enough info for an article on Flossie. ♬♩
Hurricanehink (
talk) 23:11, 13 April 2010 (UTC)reply
Support - Based on what there is in the Season article i dont think Flossie needs an article.
Jason Rees (
talk) 15:28, 13 April 2010 (UTC)reply
Close with consensus to promote -
rst20xx (
talk) 18:10, 22 April 2010 (UTC)reply
I'm nominating these eight articles for Good topic as i believe they are comprehensive and denotes the best in Wikipedia.
--Legolas(talk2me) 11:54, 20 April 2010 (UTC)reply
Support - comprehensive, as far as I can tell -
rst20xx (
talk) 17:51, 20 April 2010 (UTC)reply
Me, Parsecboy and White Shadows are nominating this for a GT because we feel that we have done all the work necesary to get them all to GA's. We got half of them done in one day after I moved Erzherzog to mainspace. I hope this passes, and I'll warn those two right now. Thanks.
Buggie111 (
talk) 19:06, 19 April 2010 (UTC)reply
Support - but with quite a low number of ships in total, I would advocate there being just one big Austo-Hungarian topic, once the others are up to scratch. Like the German battlecruisers topic -
rst20xx (
talk) 22:05, 19 April 2010 (UTC)reply
Right, but eventually, every single battleship article will be one big FT, so even the BC FT will be merged in. We're starting small and merging things up as we can.
Parsecboy (
talk) 10:56, 20 April 2010 (UTC)reply
Yeah. I know...it's a slow process. (If only they had Operation Majestic U-boat....)--
White Shadowsyou're breaking up 21:48, 20 April 2010 (UTC)reply
Hey, once we get done with the BBs and BCs, we'll need something to do :)
Parsecboy (
talk) 02:29, 21 April 2010 (UTC)reply
Have you seen the "PHase layout" section in the page. We need to get the armor, the commadners the engagements and so forth also to GA's and FA"s.
Buggie111 (
talk) 02:32, 21 April 2010 (UTC)reply
Yeah, I meant once OMT is complete.
Parsecboy (
talk) 20:17, 21 April 2010 (UTC)reply
Clearly then we'll be doing Operation Majestic Bird Farms! -
The Bushranger (
talk) 23:52, 22 April 2010 (UTC)reply
The accumulation of about a half-a-year's worth of research, compilation, and nominations brings me to this. All articles are GAs, except for "A Rugrats Chanukah" which passed its FAC last December. I believe all criteria is met here, so there shouldn't be any problems. The FlashI amJack'scompletelack of surprise 15:04, 9 April 2010 (UTC)reply
Comment - I think the topic should be renamed to the more general "Judaism in Rugrats", as I don't feel any extra articles would need including under that name (unless I'm missing something?). That'd just about be general enough in scope, IMO. Also the main article needs to be linked to on {{Rugrats}} -
rst20xx (
talk) 23:52, 12 April 2010 (UTC)reply
Support - as I said, I think this just about is okay, considering how perfectly the subarticles fit the lead article. Good luck with the upcoming FAC -
rst20xx (
talk) 01:18, 13 April 2010 (UTC)reply
Support: I had the good fortune of reviewing a few articles in this topic; it's great to see such an excellent collaboration on such a wonderful subject that is The Simpsons. Another brilliant achievement,
WP:DOH. The FlashI amJack'scompletelack of surprise 14:09, 9 April 2010 (UTC)reply
Support. Fantastic. Superb. Inspiring. Keep up the great work on the topic drive! — HunterKahn 00:34, 13 April 2010 (UTC)reply
Close with consensus to promote - one more topic to go!!!!
rst20xx (
talk) 03:07, 13 April 2010 (UTC)reply
I believe that Hannah Montana: The Movie soundtrack meets all the criteria for being a Good Topic in Wikipedia. In fact, all eight articles about the topic are of Good Article status. I have personally worked on all these articles and think that there should be no problem in listing this as a Good Topic. --
ipodnano05 *
leave@message 06:33, 31 March 2010 (UTC)reply
Throwing in my co-nom; I've worked on all of these articles and believe that they are up to standard. I also believe the topic includes all of the necessary articles, although we do plan on working on the movie and video game articles at some point.
liquidluck✽
talk 02:12, 11 April 2010 (UTC)reply
Oppose - I think this topic has an overly narrow focus, and a more general one on Hannah Montana: The Movie should be built instead. This topic would only need the articles
Hannah Montana: The Movie and
Hannah Montana: The Movie (video game) adding. The articles on the characters would not need adding as they are not exclusive to just this film -
rst20xx (
talk) 22:21, 1 April 2010 (UTC)reply
Also, you should include
The Best of Both Worlds (song), though this is a GA so can simply be added. But the article should be expanded to mention the 2009 Movie Mix -
rst20xx (
talk) 22:42, 4 April 2010 (UTC)reply
Added and information is mentioned in the lead, should suffice. --
ipodnano05 *
leave@message 21:18, 11 April 2010 (UTC)reply
Support - If the articles on the movie and video game are promoted in the near future, then by all means the topic can be expanded to a greater focus. But for now, I don't see the focus as being overly narrow.
GeeJo(t)⁄(c) • 22:48, 1 April 2010 (UTC)reply
Support current topic, with the hope that a larger topic can be created later. (Of course, I hope all topics can be expanded.) —Goodtimber (walk/talk) 23:36, 1 April 2010 (UTC)reply
Support. As per GeeJo. — HunterKahn 00:36, 13 April 2010 (UTC)reply
Close with consensus to promote -
rst20xx (
talk) 02:36, 13 April 2010 (UTC)reply
I realized just yesterday that I had an FT-worthy bunch of articles, so I'm nominating it for FTC. The season was unusual for how quiet it was, although one of the storms was one of the deadliest in the basin. Hope you like it. ♬♩
Hurricanehink (
talk) 14:45, 8 April 2010 (UTC)reply
Unlike Henriette, it didn't make landfall, and unlike Juliette, it didn't have much of a meteorological history. There's not really enough info for an article on Flossie. ♬♩
Hurricanehink (
talk) 23:11, 13 April 2010 (UTC)reply
Support - Based on what there is in the Season article i dont think Flossie needs an article.
Jason Rees (
talk) 15:28, 13 April 2010 (UTC)reply
Close with consensus to promote -
rst20xx (
talk) 18:10, 22 April 2010 (UTC)reply
I'm nominating these eight articles for Good topic as i believe they are comprehensive and denotes the best in Wikipedia.
--Legolas(talk2me) 11:54, 20 April 2010 (UTC)reply
Support - comprehensive, as far as I can tell -
rst20xx (
talk) 17:51, 20 April 2010 (UTC)reply
Me, Parsecboy and White Shadows are nominating this for a GT because we feel that we have done all the work necesary to get them all to GA's. We got half of them done in one day after I moved Erzherzog to mainspace. I hope this passes, and I'll warn those two right now. Thanks.
Buggie111 (
talk) 19:06, 19 April 2010 (UTC)reply
Support - but with quite a low number of ships in total, I would advocate there being just one big Austo-Hungarian topic, once the others are up to scratch. Like the German battlecruisers topic -
rst20xx (
talk) 22:05, 19 April 2010 (UTC)reply
Right, but eventually, every single battleship article will be one big FT, so even the BC FT will be merged in. We're starting small and merging things up as we can.
Parsecboy (
talk) 10:56, 20 April 2010 (UTC)reply
Yeah. I know...it's a slow process. (If only they had Operation Majestic U-boat....)--
White Shadowsyou're breaking up 21:48, 20 April 2010 (UTC)reply
Hey, once we get done with the BBs and BCs, we'll need something to do :)
Parsecboy (
talk) 02:29, 21 April 2010 (UTC)reply
Have you seen the "PHase layout" section in the page. We need to get the armor, the commadners the engagements and so forth also to GA's and FA"s.
Buggie111 (
talk) 02:32, 21 April 2010 (UTC)reply
Yeah, I meant once OMT is complete.
Parsecboy (
talk) 20:17, 21 April 2010 (UTC)reply
Clearly then we'll be doing Operation Majestic Bird Farms! -
The Bushranger (
talk) 23:52, 22 April 2010 (UTC)reply
The accumulation of about a half-a-year's worth of research, compilation, and nominations brings me to this. All articles are GAs, except for "A Rugrats Chanukah" which passed its FAC last December. I believe all criteria is met here, so there shouldn't be any problems. The FlashI amJack'scompletelack of surprise 15:04, 9 April 2010 (UTC)reply
Comment - I think the topic should be renamed to the more general "Judaism in Rugrats", as I don't feel any extra articles would need including under that name (unless I'm missing something?). That'd just about be general enough in scope, IMO. Also the main article needs to be linked to on {{Rugrats}} -
rst20xx (
talk) 23:52, 12 April 2010 (UTC)reply
Support - as I said, I think this just about is okay, considering how perfectly the subarticles fit the lead article. Good luck with the upcoming FAC -
rst20xx (
talk) 01:18, 13 April 2010 (UTC)reply
Support: I had the good fortune of reviewing a few articles in this topic; it's great to see such an excellent collaboration on such a wonderful subject that is The Simpsons. Another brilliant achievement,
WP:DOH. The FlashI amJack'scompletelack of surprise 14:09, 9 April 2010 (UTC)reply
Support. Fantastic. Superb. Inspiring. Keep up the great work on the topic drive! — HunterKahn 00:34, 13 April 2010 (UTC)reply
Close with consensus to promote - one more topic to go!!!!
rst20xx (
talk) 03:07, 13 April 2010 (UTC)reply
I believe that Hannah Montana: The Movie soundtrack meets all the criteria for being a Good Topic in Wikipedia. In fact, all eight articles about the topic are of Good Article status. I have personally worked on all these articles and think that there should be no problem in listing this as a Good Topic. --
ipodnano05 *
leave@message 06:33, 31 March 2010 (UTC)reply
Throwing in my co-nom; I've worked on all of these articles and believe that they are up to standard. I also believe the topic includes all of the necessary articles, although we do plan on working on the movie and video game articles at some point.
liquidluck✽
talk 02:12, 11 April 2010 (UTC)reply
Oppose - I think this topic has an overly narrow focus, and a more general one on Hannah Montana: The Movie should be built instead. This topic would only need the articles
Hannah Montana: The Movie and
Hannah Montana: The Movie (video game) adding. The articles on the characters would not need adding as they are not exclusive to just this film -
rst20xx (
talk) 22:21, 1 April 2010 (UTC)reply
Also, you should include
The Best of Both Worlds (song), though this is a GA so can simply be added. But the article should be expanded to mention the 2009 Movie Mix -
rst20xx (
talk) 22:42, 4 April 2010 (UTC)reply
Added and information is mentioned in the lead, should suffice. --
ipodnano05 *
leave@message 21:18, 11 April 2010 (UTC)reply
Support - If the articles on the movie and video game are promoted in the near future, then by all means the topic can be expanded to a greater focus. But for now, I don't see the focus as being overly narrow.
GeeJo(t)⁄(c) • 22:48, 1 April 2010 (UTC)reply
Support current topic, with the hope that a larger topic can be created later. (Of course, I hope all topics can be expanded.) —Goodtimber (walk/talk) 23:36, 1 April 2010 (UTC)reply
Support. As per GeeJo. — HunterKahn 00:36, 13 April 2010 (UTC)reply
Close with consensus to promote -
rst20xx (
talk) 02:36, 13 April 2010 (UTC)reply