Main page | Articles |
Supernova |
Type Ia ·
Type Ib and Ic ·
Type II · |
These go with a bang! Nergaal ( talk) 04:14, 24 October 2008 (UTC)
Comment This looks pretty good, but I have a concern. With History of observations being included in the topic, the scope of the topic seems to exceed just the different types of supernovae. Because of that, Supernova nucleosynthesis and Supernova remnant should also probably be included in the topic. I suggest removing the History of observations article to keep the scope focused on just the different types of supernovae for now and maybe later expanding the scope of the topic once the other articles are ready. One more minor point, I think the topic title should just be "Supernova" without the "(e)." I understand what it means, but I think some people would just be confused by it. Rreagan007 ( talk) 14:28, 24 October 2008 (UTC)
Note: ok, how about without the history section? Nergaal ( talk) 19:42, 24 October 2008 (UTC)
Main page | Articles |
Supernova |
Type Ia ·
Type Ib and Ic ·
Type II · |
These go with a bang! Nergaal ( talk) 04:14, 24 October 2008 (UTC)
Comment This looks pretty good, but I have a concern. With History of observations being included in the topic, the scope of the topic seems to exceed just the different types of supernovae. Because of that, Supernova nucleosynthesis and Supernova remnant should also probably be included in the topic. I suggest removing the History of observations article to keep the scope focused on just the different types of supernovae for now and maybe later expanding the scope of the topic once the other articles are ready. One more minor point, I think the topic title should just be "Supernova" without the "(e)." I understand what it means, but I think some people would just be confused by it. Rreagan007 ( talk) 14:28, 24 October 2008 (UTC)
Note: ok, how about without the history section? Nergaal ( talk) 19:42, 24 October 2008 (UTC)