Nominating for Featured Topic. Seven of the eight articles are FAs, and the remaining one is a GA; this set covers every article we have on the topic or are ever likely to have. (The locomotives primarily used by the line were one-off designs, which are never going to warrant their own articles.) – iridescent 17:13, 24 September 2010 (UTC)
Support A long labour on Iridescent's part comes to a deserved end.-- DavidCane ( talk) 23:06, 24 September 2010 (UTC)
{{
Oxford area RDT}}
, which ignores operators and considers only relative positions of main features. This RDT is displayed in collapsed state, and when expanded is not overly large.{{
Brill Tramway RDT}}
, which covers the line itself, and
Quainton Road railway station can have something like
this, which may also be placed on
Waddesdon Road railway station because that specific station is linked from that RDT. However,
Westcott railway station,
Wotton (Metropolitan Railway) railway station,
Wood Siding railway station and
Brill railway station don't need RDTs. --
Redrose64 (
talk)
19:36, 25 September 2010 (UTC){{
Brill Tramway RDT}}
fits that bill), which would be placed on the two main articles; the other would be a new RDT restricted to the environs of Quainton Road, to be placed on just two of the station articles. Four station articles will have no RDT at all, the existing succ boxes being perfectly adequate for a linear situation. The two RDTs don't need to be expanded by default, either: |collapse=<includeonly>yes</includeonly><noinclude>no</noinclude>
can be put in the {{
Railway line header}}
of the RDT template.{{
Brill Tramway RDT}}
that isn't also in
File:Brill tramway system diagram.png, the RDT has the advantage that it is clickable. --
Redrose64 (
talk)
19:36, 26 September 2010 (UTC)Closed with a consensus to promote.-- Sturmvogel 66 ( talk) 01:42, 5 October 2010 (UTC)
Nominating for Featured Topic. Seven of the eight articles are FAs, and the remaining one is a GA; this set covers every article we have on the topic or are ever likely to have. (The locomotives primarily used by the line were one-off designs, which are never going to warrant their own articles.) – iridescent 17:13, 24 September 2010 (UTC)
Support A long labour on Iridescent's part comes to a deserved end.-- DavidCane ( talk) 23:06, 24 September 2010 (UTC)
{{
Oxford area RDT}}
, which ignores operators and considers only relative positions of main features. This RDT is displayed in collapsed state, and when expanded is not overly large.{{
Brill Tramway RDT}}
, which covers the line itself, and
Quainton Road railway station can have something like
this, which may also be placed on
Waddesdon Road railway station because that specific station is linked from that RDT. However,
Westcott railway station,
Wotton (Metropolitan Railway) railway station,
Wood Siding railway station and
Brill railway station don't need RDTs. --
Redrose64 (
talk)
19:36, 25 September 2010 (UTC){{
Brill Tramway RDT}}
fits that bill), which would be placed on the two main articles; the other would be a new RDT restricted to the environs of Quainton Road, to be placed on just two of the station articles. Four station articles will have no RDT at all, the existing succ boxes being perfectly adequate for a linear situation. The two RDTs don't need to be expanded by default, either: |collapse=<includeonly>yes</includeonly><noinclude>no</noinclude>
can be put in the {{
Railway line header}}
of the RDT template.{{
Brill Tramway RDT}}
that isn't also in
File:Brill tramway system diagram.png, the RDT has the advantage that it is clickable. --
Redrose64 (
talk)
19:36, 26 September 2010 (UTC)Closed with a consensus to promote.-- Sturmvogel 66 ( talk) 01:42, 5 October 2010 (UTC)