1st Airborne Division (United Kingdom)
13 articles
- Contributor(s): Jim Sweeney, Skinny87, Ranger Steve
I believe the article meets the Good Topic criteria. It includes a set of similar, interrelated articles that cover a specific topic, which are all GA Class or above. -- Jim Sweeney ( talk) 08:07, 1 October 2011 (UTC)
- Support All the articles on this division's major sub-units and operations are of GA standard - great work Jim. Nick-D ( talk) 08:59, 1 October 2011 (UTC)
- Support What can I say? Simply exemplary. Sp33dyphil " Ad astra" 09:35, 1 October 2011 (UTC)
- Support Superb. Superb. Buggie111 ( talk) 14:28, 1 October 2011 (UTC)
| Resolved comments from Headbomb |
|---|
Comments
|
- Support Why not add British airborne operations in North Africa? It's a good article too. You might also consider Frederick Browning. Hawkeye7 ( talk) 23:17, 3 October 2011 (UTC)
- I had not considered Browning, but the North Africa operation was not carried out by the 1st Airborne Division, just the 1st Parachute Brigade in an independent role. Jim Sweeney ( talk) 06:56, 4 October 2011 (UTC)
- Support (Disclaimer - main contributor to the Battle of Arnhem article). Ranger Steve Talk 20:05, 13 October 2011 (UTC)
- Support A great example of a GT. Zangar ( talk) 11:41, 15 October 2011 (UTC)
- Support - Excellent work all around. Keep it up! Parsecboy ( talk) 12:49, 15 October 2011 (UTC)
- Comment In the footnotes section of the lead article I'm seeing three long gibberish strings, the first being "?UNIQ516aa7fbef5695e-nowiki-00000004-QINU?2?UNIQ516aa7fbef5695e-nowiki-00000005-QINU?". Is this on my end or is something broken over there? Sven Manguard Wha? 17:25, 25 October 2011 (UTC)
- Sorry dont see that Sven
Jim Sweeney (
talk) 21:10, 25 October 2011 (UTC)
- I do see this problem in my normal Chrome and also in IE9, but only when logged out in both - I have no idea as to why!
Zangar (
talk) 10:56, 26 October 2011 (UTC)
- Yes logged out and get the same, it seems to link to the citation but instead of [22] has the uni-code. I have never seen it before and would not know how to fix it. Its strange as its not happening with other citations and a quick spot check of the other articles does not display the same.
Jim Sweeney (
talk) 11:24, 26 October 2011 (UTC)
- OK I have changed a <ref name=ferg15/> to <ref name=ferg15>Ferguson, p15</ref> which seem to have fixed it. Jim Sweeney ( talk) 11:40, 26 October 2011 (UTC)
- Yes logged out and get the same, it seems to link to the citation but instead of [22] has the uni-code. I have never seen it before and would not know how to fix it. Its strange as its not happening with other citations and a quick spot check of the other articles does not display the same.
Jim Sweeney (
talk) 11:24, 26 October 2011 (UTC)
- I do see this problem in my normal Chrome and also in IE9, but only when logged out in both - I have no idea as to why!
Zangar (
talk) 10:56, 26 October 2011 (UTC)
- Sorry dont see that Sven
Jim Sweeney (
talk) 21:10, 25 October 2011 (UTC)
- Support. Excellent and well-organised coverage of a focused topic area. (Disclaimer: I copy-edited two of these articles for GA.) -- Demiurge1000 ( talk) 17:46, 25 October 2011 (UTC)
- Closed with consensus to promote as good topic. Wizardman Operation Big Bear 02:50, 29 October 2011 (UTC)
1st Airborne Division (United Kingdom)
13 articles
- Contributor(s): Jim Sweeney, Skinny87, Ranger Steve
I believe the article meets the Good Topic criteria. It includes a set of similar, interrelated articles that cover a specific topic, which are all GA Class or above. -- Jim Sweeney ( talk) 08:07, 1 October 2011 (UTC)
- Support All the articles on this division's major sub-units and operations are of GA standard - great work Jim. Nick-D ( talk) 08:59, 1 October 2011 (UTC)
- Support What can I say? Simply exemplary. Sp33dyphil " Ad astra" 09:35, 1 October 2011 (UTC)
- Support Superb. Superb. Buggie111 ( talk) 14:28, 1 October 2011 (UTC)
| Resolved comments from Headbomb |
|---|
Comments
|
- Support Why not add British airborne operations in North Africa? It's a good article too. You might also consider Frederick Browning. Hawkeye7 ( talk) 23:17, 3 October 2011 (UTC)
- I had not considered Browning, but the North Africa operation was not carried out by the 1st Airborne Division, just the 1st Parachute Brigade in an independent role. Jim Sweeney ( talk) 06:56, 4 October 2011 (UTC)
- Support (Disclaimer - main contributor to the Battle of Arnhem article). Ranger Steve Talk 20:05, 13 October 2011 (UTC)
- Support A great example of a GT. Zangar ( talk) 11:41, 15 October 2011 (UTC)
- Support - Excellent work all around. Keep it up! Parsecboy ( talk) 12:49, 15 October 2011 (UTC)
- Comment In the footnotes section of the lead article I'm seeing three long gibberish strings, the first being "?UNIQ516aa7fbef5695e-nowiki-00000004-QINU?2?UNIQ516aa7fbef5695e-nowiki-00000005-QINU?". Is this on my end or is something broken over there? Sven Manguard Wha? 17:25, 25 October 2011 (UTC)
- Sorry dont see that Sven
Jim Sweeney (
talk) 21:10, 25 October 2011 (UTC)
- I do see this problem in my normal Chrome and also in IE9, but only when logged out in both - I have no idea as to why!
Zangar (
talk) 10:56, 26 October 2011 (UTC)
- Yes logged out and get the same, it seems to link to the citation but instead of [22] has the uni-code. I have never seen it before and would not know how to fix it. Its strange as its not happening with other citations and a quick spot check of the other articles does not display the same.
Jim Sweeney (
talk) 11:24, 26 October 2011 (UTC)
- OK I have changed a <ref name=ferg15/> to <ref name=ferg15>Ferguson, p15</ref> which seem to have fixed it. Jim Sweeney ( talk) 11:40, 26 October 2011 (UTC)
- Yes logged out and get the same, it seems to link to the citation but instead of [22] has the uni-code. I have never seen it before and would not know how to fix it. Its strange as its not happening with other citations and a quick spot check of the other articles does not display the same.
Jim Sweeney (
talk) 11:24, 26 October 2011 (UTC)
- I do see this problem in my normal Chrome and also in IE9, but only when logged out in both - I have no idea as to why!
Zangar (
talk) 10:56, 26 October 2011 (UTC)
- Sorry dont see that Sven
Jim Sweeney (
talk) 21:10, 25 October 2011 (UTC)
- Support. Excellent and well-organised coverage of a focused topic area. (Disclaimer: I copy-edited two of these articles for GA.) -- Demiurge1000 ( talk) 17:46, 25 October 2011 (UTC)
- Closed with consensus to promote as good topic. Wizardman Operation Big Bear 02:50, 29 October 2011 (UTC)