- Support as nominator Camptown ( talk) 22:08, 29 March 2008 (UTC)
- Comment A little small, perhaps even for an animation. What I'm really concerned about though is the article placement. Wouldn't sunrise, corona, astronomical seeing, and even Optical phenomenon make better homes?-- HereToHelp ( talk to me) 00:23, 30 March 2008 (UTC)
- Oppose too shaky. — Pengo 00:27, 30 March 2008 (UTC)
- Oppose other issues aside I think it's just too small, this should be a relatively easy sequence to reproduce and each image could be much larger/clearer. Guest9999 ( talk) 01:40, 30 March 2008 (UTC)
- Oppose it really makes sense to stabilize this. Papa Lima Whiskey ( talk) 14:16, 2 April 2008 (UTC)
Not promoted . -- John254 00:17, 4 April 2008 (UTC)
- Support as nominator Camptown ( talk) 22:08, 29 March 2008 (UTC)
- Comment A little small, perhaps even for an animation. What I'm really concerned about though is the article placement. Wouldn't sunrise, corona, astronomical seeing, and even Optical phenomenon make better homes?-- HereToHelp ( talk to me) 00:23, 30 March 2008 (UTC)
- Oppose too shaky. — Pengo 00:27, 30 March 2008 (UTC)
- Oppose other issues aside I think it's just too small, this should be a relatively easy sequence to reproduce and each image could be much larger/clearer. Guest9999 ( talk) 01:40, 30 March 2008 (UTC)
- Oppose it really makes sense to stabilize this. Papa Lima Whiskey ( talk) 14:16, 2 April 2008 (UTC)
Not promoted . -- John254 00:17, 4 April 2008 (UTC)