There were good oppose reasons in the original nom, and I think WRT today's standards, it's too noisy, not sharp enough, and evident of jpeg compression.
Oh heavens yes, delist. As the primary editor of the
Joan of Arc article, it's always mystified me how this passed FAC in the first place (must've been a miracle).
DurovaCharge! 04:55, 6 March 2009 (UTC)reply
Delist I see little EV in this photo, and the overall lighting is very disappointing. It looks very mediocre to me, and not FP-caliber. --
mcshadyplTC 06:47, 6 March 2009 (UTC)reply
There were good oppose reasons in the original nom, and I think WRT today's standards, it's too noisy, not sharp enough, and evident of jpeg compression.
Oh heavens yes, delist. As the primary editor of the
Joan of Arc article, it's always mystified me how this passed FAC in the first place (must've been a miracle).
DurovaCharge! 04:55, 6 March 2009 (UTC)reply
Delist I see little EV in this photo, and the overall lighting is very disappointing. It looks very mediocre to me, and not FP-caliber. --
mcshadyplTC 06:47, 6 March 2009 (UTC)reply