Brisbane by night

Reason

Not a bad picture but not exceptional either for such an often-photographed subject. I think we can do better.

Nominator

KFP ( talk | contribs)

• Delist — KFP ( talk | contribs) 14:13, 24 January 2007 (UTC) reply
• Delist Doesn't meet size requirements Joe D 22:00, 24 January 2007 (UTC) reply
• Delist per above, not to mention the overexposure blowing the highlights. - Fcb981 23:57, 24 January 2007 (UTC) reply
• Delist Nice pic, but a tad too small. Jumping cheese ^{Cont @ct} 04:06, 25 January 2007 (UTC) reply
• Delist Too small and not particularly pleasing to my eye. - Wutschwlllm 19:25, 25 January 2007 (UTC) reply
• Delist What is that thing behind the buildings. Bewareofdog 23:34, 25 January 2007 (UTC) reply
  • A cloud? -- KFP ( talk | contribs) 23:40, 25 January 2007 (UTC) reply
  • Godzilla? -- froth ^T 22:31, 27 January 2007 (UTC) reply
  • The Stay Puft Marshmallow Man? -- KFP ( talk | contribs) 23:00, 27 January 2007 (UTC) reply
• Delist - Tilted, too small, artifacts. — Dgies ^{t  c} 05:41, 26 January 2007 (UTC) reply
• Comment, so this one is worse than this one how? ~ trialsanderrors 09:47, 30 January 2007 (UTC) reply
  • I'm not saying this is much worse than that one, but compare this image with this or some other images of the same subject at Flickr ( example search). I think featured pictures should be exceptional in some way. -- KFP ( talk | contribs) 12:07, 30 January 2007 (UTC) reply
  • In fact it's not really different and I voted for delisting on the one you mentioned too and I can't understand why anyone would want to keep it, but that's democracy (sometimes it sucks, but hey...). - Wutschwlllm 13:36, 30 January 2007 (UTC) reply
    • nope -- froth ^T 21:55, 30 January 2007 (UTC) reply
      • Well, in fact, this is very close to democracy......and the "consensus" is executed a bit arbitrarily too (but that's just my opinion). - Wutschwlllm 20:19, 1 February 2007 (UTC) reply
  • P.S.: The other one was kept because it "fits size requirements", which seems a bit arbitrary to me, especially since it looks like a panorama. - Wutschwlllm 13:39, 30 January 2007 (UTC) reply
    • Tells you something about the arbitrariness of size requirements. They're both ~50,000 pixels. Oh, and Delist. ~ trialsanderrors 19:07, 30 January 2007 (UTC) reply
      • That one wasn't about size. The oldest voters on FPC voted to keep it because it had a superior composition and atmosphere and the best of it's subject we have. -- Arad 22:28, 31 January 2007 (UTC) reply

Delisted. -- KFP ( talk | contribs) 01:56, 4 February 2007 (UTC) reply