Panorama of Edo
Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 7 Sep 2010 at 10:51:29 (UTC)
- Reason
- To be replaced with the better-stitched, photochrom colour version.
- Articles this image appears in
- Formerly Edo. The photochrom colour version has been used for over a year now.
- Previous nomination/s
- An earlier nomination for promotion of the photochrom failed because of complaints about stitching errors (minor considering the age imo). The black-and-white copy that is the current FP has even more stitching problems, so everything speaks for the replacement. Original nomination.
- Nominator
- Papa Lima Whiskey ( talk)
- Delist and replace The failed nomination is a bit of a joke if you ask me. Papa Lima Whiskey ( talk) 10:51, 24 August 2010 (UTC)
- Delist and replace It's ridiculous to have this image in the much, much worse copy as an FP. Adam Cuerden ( talk) 12:27, 24 August 2010 (UTC)
- Delist, clearly- the fact the better copy recently failed should be reason enough to lose this. However, I think the fact the replacement has already failed a nom means it should have to go through the proper process again, rather than being promoted as a replacement. J Milburn ( talk) 14:30, 24 August 2010 (UTC)
- Delist. The new very is much better, but doesn't seem to be FP level to me. No idea how the original made it. Kaldari ( talk) 00:47, 26 August 2010 (UTC)
- Delist only. The new version should go through a separate nomimation given it failed last time. -- Avenue ( talk) 03:31, 6 September 2010 (UTC)
Delisted -- Makeemlighter ( talk) 18:59, 7 September 2010 (UTC)
Panorama of Edo
Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 7 Sep 2010 at 10:51:29 (UTC)
- Reason
- To be replaced with the better-stitched, photochrom colour version.
- Articles this image appears in
- Formerly Edo. The photochrom colour version has been used for over a year now.
- Previous nomination/s
- An earlier nomination for promotion of the photochrom failed because of complaints about stitching errors (minor considering the age imo). The black-and-white copy that is the current FP has even more stitching problems, so everything speaks for the replacement. Original nomination.
- Nominator
- Papa Lima Whiskey ( talk)
- Delist and replace The failed nomination is a bit of a joke if you ask me. Papa Lima Whiskey ( talk) 10:51, 24 August 2010 (UTC)
- Delist and replace It's ridiculous to have this image in the much, much worse copy as an FP. Adam Cuerden ( talk) 12:27, 24 August 2010 (UTC)
- Delist, clearly- the fact the better copy recently failed should be reason enough to lose this. However, I think the fact the replacement has already failed a nom means it should have to go through the proper process again, rather than being promoted as a replacement. J Milburn ( talk) 14:30, 24 August 2010 (UTC)
- Delist. The new very is much better, but doesn't seem to be FP level to me. No idea how the original made it. Kaldari ( talk) 00:47, 26 August 2010 (UTC)
- Delist only. The new version should go through a separate nomimation given it failed last time. -- Avenue ( talk) 03:31, 6 September 2010 (UTC)
Delisted -- Makeemlighter ( talk) 18:59, 7 September 2010 (UTC)