- Reason
- Low resolution, very little detail for something so large, looks artificially placed.
- Previous nomination/s
- Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates/Huntsman spider.jpg
- Previous nominator notified
[1]- Nominator
- Muhammad (talk)
- Delist — Muhammad (talk) 05:09, 3 June 2009 (UTC)
- Delist. Agreed, no longer of sufficient quality. Diliff | (Talk) (Contribs) 22:07, 3 June 2009 (UTC)
- Delist. This is a very common species in Australia and NZ, not difficult to reproduce. Mostlyharmless ( talk) 02:28, 5 June 2009 (UTC)
- Delist. I don't imagine this would pass today. Plus, it looks awkwardly punched out of the background. Kaldari ( talk) 20:08, 5 June 2009 (UTC)
- Comment Meets minimum size requirement. Papa Lima Whiskey ( talk) 08:09, 8 June 2009 (UTC)
Delisted Consensus seems clear. -- wadester 16 05:13, 23 June 2009 (UTC)
- Reason
- Low resolution, very little detail for something so large, looks artificially placed.
- Previous nomination/s
- Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates/Huntsman spider.jpg
- Previous nominator notified
-
[1]
- Nominator
- Muhammad (talk)
- Delist — Muhammad (talk) 05:09, 3 June 2009 (UTC)
- Delist. Agreed, no longer of sufficient quality. Diliff | (Talk) (Contribs) 22:07, 3 June 2009 (UTC)
- Delist. This is a very common species in Australia and NZ, not difficult to reproduce. Mostlyharmless ( talk) 02:28, 5 June 2009 (UTC)
- Delist. I don't imagine this would pass today. Plus, it looks awkwardly punched out of the background. Kaldari ( talk) 20:08, 5 June 2009 (UTC)
- Comment Meets minimum size requirement. Papa Lima Whiskey ( talk) 08:09, 8 June 2009 (UTC)
Delisted Consensus seems clear. -- wadester 16 05:13, 23 June 2009 (UTC)