Aust blue dragonfly02
- Reason
- Smaller than the minimum size requirements, image appears to be noisy and quality is not up to today's standards.
- Previous nomination/s
- Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates/Aust blue dragonfly02.jpg
- Nominator
- Muhammad (talk)
- Delist — Muhammad (talk) 18:22, 19 October 2008 (UTC)
- Delist Very messy BG, and also too small... -- Janke | Talk 10:35, 20 October 2008 (UTC)
- Comment Can we suspend this for a month so that I can have a chance to upload a higher res file from the original? (I don't have the originals with me in Melbourne) -- Fir0002 11:13, 20 October 2008 (UTC)
- Higher res won't change the messy bg... -- Janke | Talk 13:16, 11 November 2008 (UTC)
- Delist per nom. Additionally, the background is very distracting. — αἰτίας • discussion• 01:59, 2 November 2008 (UTC)
- Delist per nom. Much better dragonfly images have been promoted in the last year. Cacophony ( talk) 08:01, 11 November 2008 (UTC)
- 'Delist. The background is the big flaw; the size is not such a big deal since this was an early promotion, but the messiness makes this not what we would accept now composition-wise.-- ragesoss ( talk) 04:54, 18 November 2008 (UTC)
- Delist Regardless of size, the composition is subpar. Calliopejen1 ( talk) 15:53, 19 November 2008 (UTC)
Delisted MER-C 23:58, 19 November 2008 (UTC)
Aust blue dragonfly02
- Reason
- Smaller than the minimum size requirements, image appears to be noisy and quality is not up to today's standards.
- Previous nomination/s
- Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates/Aust blue dragonfly02.jpg
- Nominator
- Muhammad (talk)
- Delist — Muhammad (talk) 18:22, 19 October 2008 (UTC)
- Delist Very messy BG, and also too small... -- Janke | Talk 10:35, 20 October 2008 (UTC)
- Comment Can we suspend this for a month so that I can have a chance to upload a higher res file from the original? (I don't have the originals with me in Melbourne) -- Fir0002 11:13, 20 October 2008 (UTC)
- Higher res won't change the messy bg... -- Janke | Talk 13:16, 11 November 2008 (UTC)
- Delist per nom. Additionally, the background is very distracting. — αἰτίας • discussion• 01:59, 2 November 2008 (UTC)
- Delist per nom. Much better dragonfly images have been promoted in the last year. Cacophony ( talk) 08:01, 11 November 2008 (UTC)
- 'Delist. The background is the big flaw; the size is not such a big deal since this was an early promotion, but the messiness makes this not what we would accept now composition-wise.-- ragesoss ( talk) 04:54, 18 November 2008 (UTC)
- Delist Regardless of size, the composition is subpar. Calliopejen1 ( talk) 15:53, 19 November 2008 (UTC)
Delisted MER-C 23:58, 19 November 2008 (UTC)