WIKIPEDIA:FEATURED PICTURE CANDIDATES DELIST 2020

This is an archive page for featured picture status removal debates. These debates are closed and should not be edited. For more information see Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates.

2006 - 2007 - 2008 - 2009 - 2010 - 2011 - 2012 - 2013 - 2014 - 2015
2016 - 2017 - 2018 - 2019 - 2020 - 2021 - 2022 - 2023 - 2024

Retained

Delist and Replace: Ronald Reagan

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 1 Apr 2020 at 19:48:18 (UTC)

Reason: Not sure if this is an improvement from the current version but I'll nominate this anyways. Original image for the replacement is at File:Official Portrait of President Ronald Reagan.jpg.

Suggested replacement
Articles this image appears in: Ronald Reagan, see more
Previous nomination/s: Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates/Ronald Reagan
Nominator: Wow ( talk)

Delist and replace — Wow ( talk) 19:48, 22 March 2020 (UTC) reply
Keep – his shirt is no longer white, and if you zoom in, the details on his skin are washed out in the replacement image. Bammesk ( talk) 20:51, 22 March 2020 (UTC) reply

Yikes. Good eye. Green meanie. -- Veggies ( talk) 22:03, 22 March 2020 (UTC) reply

Oppose proposed change per the Green Shirt. — David Eppstein ( talk) 19:24, 24 March 2020 (UTC) reply
Comment – I uploaded a new version so that it's not as green overall, but the sharpness issue can't be fixed. -- Wow ( talk) 20:07, 24 March 2020 (UTC) reply
Withdraw -- Wow ( talk) 05:59, 28 March 2020 (UTC) reply

Kept -- Armbrust ^{The Homunculus} 02:36, 30 March 2020 (UTC) reply

Delist: Horatio Nelson, 1st Viscount Nelson

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 6 Apr 2020 at 13:13:01 (UTC)

Reason: poor resolution when zoomed in as the area around the eyes of the person depicted are somewhat blurry

Articles this image appears in: Horatio Nelson, 1st Viscount Nelson
Previous nomination/s: Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates/Horatio Nelson, 1st Viscount Nelson
Nominator: TheHistoryBuff101 ( talk)

Delist — TheHistoryBuff101 ( talk) 20:29, 17 March 2020 (UTC) reply
Keep - No way. The replacement image may be larger, but it has a universal yellow tint to everything that's muddling the colors. Look at the white fringe on Nelson's ribbons and notice how they're yellowed in the replacement. The uniform has lost its hue as well. -- Veggies ( talk) 13:38, 27 March 2020 (UTC) reply
I think we don't promote TIFF files because of accessibility. I would support if the replacement was in JPEG. It has a reliable source. Bammesk ( talk) 19:26, 29 March 2020 (UTC) reply
Comment This nomination was added to the FPC page with this edit, so I fixed the expiry date based on its timestamp. Armbrust ^{The Homunculus} 02:34, 30 March 2020 (UTC) reply
Comment The TIFF version has original colors because it was common to leave this yellow tint and additionally it is layer added that happens with the passage of time, a faithful representation of reality. However, I agree that a JPEG needs to be developed from the TIFF for its best representation in browsers preferably using RGB. -- The_Photographer ( talk) 19:43, 31 March 2020 (UTC) reply

Kept -- Armbrust ^{The Homunculus} 14:16, 6 April 2020 (UTC) reply

There is no consensus to delist this image, which is still used in articles. Armbrust ^{The Homunculus} 14:16, 6 April 2020 (UTC) reply

Delist: Another Place3 edit2.jpg

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 13 Apr 2020 at 13:08:27 (UTC)

Reason: Blown highlights, zero detail in the sculpture—It may as well be three naked people standing on the beach for all the viewer can tell. The sculpture article already has closeups in daylight of the individual figures, giving the reader a much clearer perspective on what a portion of the work actually looks like up close. Thus, both the technical qualities and EV are lacking in this picture.
Articles this image appears in: Another Place (sculpture)
Previous nomination/s: Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates/Image:Another Place3 edit2.jpg
Nominator: Veggies ( talk)

Delist — Veggies ( talk) 13:08, 3 April 2020 (UTC) reply
Delist this looks like one of those old photos from the late 2000s; surely a better-composed picture of this sculpture can be obtained? – John M Wolfson ( talk • contribs) 04:11, 5 April 2020 (UTC) reply
Delist. The criticisms of the nomination are valid. I think this is too much about getting an artsy shot and not enough about clearly depicting the subject to be encyclopedic. (To be fair, I think the same thing about many of my own shots. But then, I haven't tried listing any of them for FP...) — David Eppstein ( talk) 06:04, 5 April 2020 (UTC) reply

Kept -- Armbrust ^{The Homunculus} 13:17, 13 April 2020 (UTC) reply

There is not enough support for delisting this image, and it's still used in Another Place (sculpture). Armbrust ^{The Homunculus} 13:17, 13 April 2020 (UTC) reply

I'm disappointed that I missed the voting for this nomination. This is objectively a very poor quality image and I find it hard to believe that this was ever selected as a FP. The photo's foreground is completely underexposed while the sky is blown out. I agree that this does a poor job of depicting the intended subject. -- mcshadypl ^T ^C 04:44, 15 April 2020 (UTC) reply

and above comment by mcshadypl pretty much sums up why I gave up with Wikipedia ~15 years ago not long after I uploaded the image - which was taken during the winter at sunset - hence the dark foreground, which was an accurate representation of what it actually looked like. 15 years ago there was a lot less content on wikipedia and digital cameras were in their infancy, having not long graduated from film at the time. Maybe it's an 'very poor quality image' and does a 'poor job of depicting the intended subject', however it's widely used on quite a number of various language wikipedias. Anyway, whatevs'. Maybe I'll log in to wikipedia again some time in the next 15 years. chowells ( talk) 20:42, 22 January 2021 (UTC) reply

Delist: Petrified forest log

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 23 Apr 2020 at 23:10:00 (UTC)

Reason: It no longer meets the minimum resolution for an FP. Further, it really isn't used in a way that present the image in a compelling way beyond all other similar pictures on Wikipedia. Beyond that, there is already a suitable FP alternative at File:Petrified wood closeup 2.jpg.
Articles this image appears in: Geology, Plant
Previous nomination/s: Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates/Petrified forest log
Nominator: Veggies ( talk)

Delist — Veggies ( talk) 23:10, 13 April 2020 (UTC) reply
Keep. I think for this still to be used in such core articles shows its value; it is the main image in the 'Fossils' section of the 'Plant' article. I think a whole log in context has value separate to the other FP. Resolution requirements aren't retrospective. TSP ( talk) 21:10, 14 April 2020 (UTC) reply

Kept -- Armbrust ^{The Homunculus} 23:12, 23 April 2020 (UTC) reply

No consensus to delist this image, which is still used in two articles. Armbrust ^{The Homunculus} 23:12, 23 April 2020 (UTC) reply

Delist: Deep Impact Probe Collision

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 26 Apr 2020 at 08:38:41 (UTC)

Reason: Below the minimum resolution, this image is at 900 pixels limit. It is not possible to find a larger resolution version on the NASA website. As per Wikipedia:Featured picture criteria/Image size.
Articles this image appears in: Deep Impact (spacecraft), Tempel 1, etc.
Previous nomination/s: Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates/Deep Impact HRI..jpeg
Nominator: JCP2018 ( talk)

Delist — JCP2018 ( talk) 08:38, 16 April 2020 (UTC) reply
Keep - this image was nominated for delisting two years ago ( Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates/delist/Deep Impact Probe Collision) for this very reason and was kept. Nothing has changed. The resolution criteria is not retroactive, and this image falls into the category where we look the other way. MER-C 16:27, 16 April 2020 (UTC) reply
Keep I don't understand this nomination: this seems to be the best quality photo of this historic event which is available, and the article notes that the image has EV in its own right. Nick-D ( talk) 08:42, 17 April 2020 (UTC) reply
Keep. An image which has high EV in its own right (rather than merely for what it depicts) should be judged for what it is. It's irreplaceable, and should not be judged by the standards for replaceable images. — David Eppstein ( talk) 06:46, 18 April 2020 (UTC) reply

Kept -- Armbrust ^{The Homunculus} 09:03, 26 April 2020 (UTC) reply

Delist: Hyperion

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 26 Apr 2020 at 09:12:59 (UTC)

Reason: This image is used in only one article left, but has lower EV.
Articles this image appears in: Hyperion (moon)
Previous nomination/s: Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates/Hyperion
Nominator: JCP2018 ( talk)

Delist — JCP2018 ( talk) 09:12, 16 April 2020 (UTC) reply
Comment I don't understand - lower EV than what? It's in the article about itself, so that doesn't diminish the EV... -- Janke | Talk 09:58, 16 April 2020 (UTC) reply
Keep per Janke. MER-C 16:26, 16 April 2020 (UTC) reply

Kept -- Armbrust ^{The Homunculus} 09:22, 26 April 2020 (UTC) reply

There is no consensus to delist this image, which is still used in one article. Armbrust ^{The Homunculus} 09:22, 26 April 2020 (UTC) reply

Delist and Replace: Louvre Museum - replace

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 1 May 2020 at 02:45:20 (UTC)

Reason: A higher quality image by the same photographer. The new image has replaced the old one in most relevant articles.
Articles this image appears in: Original image: Outline of France
Replacement: Louvre, Louvre Palace, Louvre Pyramid, + others
Previous nomination/s: Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates/Louvre Panorama
Nominator: Bammesk ( talk)

Delist and replace – Bammesk ( talk) 02:45, 21 April 2020 (UTC) reply
Delist and replace – -- Janke | Talk 09:13, 21 April 2020 (UTC) reply
Replace. MER-C 18:52, 21 April 2020 (UTC) reply
D&R. -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 19:12, 22 April 2020 (UTC) reply
Comment - Slightly off-center. -- Veggies ( talk) 20:28, 25 April 2020 (UTC) reply

Kept -- Armbrust ^{The Homunculus} 16:20, 1 May 2020 (UTC) reply

There isn't enough support to replace this featured picture, which is still used in Outline of France. Armbrust ^{The Homunculus} 16:20, 1 May 2020 (UTC) reply

Delist: Phalacrocorax-auritus-007.jpg

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 10 May 2020 at 01:11:04 (UTC)

Reason: We have a higher resolution image with better composition at this link which was nominated recently and has sufficient support.
Articles this image appears in: Double-crested cormorant, Seabird, + many lists
Previous nomination/s: Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates/Phalacrocorax-auritus-007.jpg
Nominator: Bammesk ( talk)

Delist — Bammesk ( talk) 01:11, 30 April 2020 (UTC) reply
Delist -- Gnosis ( talk) 04:01, 30 April 2020 (UTC) reply
Delist (assuming the other one passes as it appears to be doing) — David Eppstein ( talk) 04:33, 30 April 2020 (UTC) reply
Keep Reason for delist is invalid. This is an adult. the other is a juvenile. Charlesjsharp ( talk) 09:50, 30 April 2020 (UTC) reply
Keep per Charlesjsharp. The new FP doesn't invalidate this one, as they illustrate different life stages. There is no rule against multiple FPs of one subject if both have value. TSP ( talk) 13:48, 1 May 2020 (UTC) reply

Kept -- Armbrust ^{The Homunculus} 08:27, 10 May 2020 (UTC) reply

There is no consensus to delist this image, which is still used in many articles. Armbrust ^{The Homunculus} 08:27, 10 May 2020 (UTC) reply

Delist and Replace: Eiffel Tower (2009 FP)

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 1 Sep 2020 at 23:49:10 (UTC)

Reason: The cropped version is the one actually used in the main article, and has been stable there since 2016.
Articles this image appears in: Current FP is still in Landmark, Landmarks in Paris, Lattice tower, List of cultural icons of France, List of nonbuilding structure types, Structural art and Structural engineering; suggested replacement is in Eiffel Tower, Arch and List of most visited palaces and monuments
Previous nomination/s: Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates/Eiffel Tower
Nominator: Paul_012 ( talk)

~~Delist & replace~~ — Paul_012 ( talk) 23:49, 22 August 2020 (UTC) reply
Rather over-cropped if you ask me. Maye try a compromise? Leave the top as in uncropped, crop the bottom somewhere between? Adam Cuerden ^(
talk)_{Has about 7.4% of all
FPs} 09:33, 23 August 2020 (UTC) reply
- Something like Alt1 below? -- Paul_012 ( talk) 09:17, 24 August 2020 (UTC) reply

Alt1 – half as cropped (CSS image crop)

I agree regarding the over-crop. I prefer the original. It was probably cropped just for infobox use. Bammesk ( talk) 03:04, 24 August 2020 (UTC) reply
- I agree that the current FP is aesthetically better, but the aspect ratio really doesn't work well for infobox use (even the cropped version still overwhelms the vertical space). Are we okay with not having the FP be used in the main article, where it has the most EV? -- Paul_012 ( talk) 09:17, 24 August 2020 (UTC) reply
- Keep. Trivially restored to the page using {{ CSS image crop}}. Which I did. Adam Cuerden ^(
  talk)_{Has about 7.4% of all
  FPs} 12:47, 24 August 2020 (UTC) reply
  - Ah, never thought of that as an option. Withdrawing nomination. -- Paul_012 ( talk) 17:53, 24 August 2020 (UTC) reply
Keep per Adam. MER-C 17:20, 24 August 2020 (UTC) reply

Kept -- Armbrust ^{The Homunculus} 15:41, 25 August 2020 (UTC) reply

Withdrawn nomination. Armbrust ^{The Homunculus} 15:41, 25 August 2020 (UTC) reply

Replaced

Delist and Replace: Hipp hipp hurra!

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 22 Mar 2020 at 23:32:28 (UTC)

Reason: The newer version has been demisted and gives a clearer view of the brushwork. The article on the painting uses the suggested replacement rather than the current featured version (not that means much as anyone can edit it).
Articles this image appears in: Danish art, Gothenburg Museum of Art, Helga Ancher, Impressionism, List of paintings by Peder Severin Krøyer, Party, Peder Severin Krøyer, Skagen. Toast (honor), White wine
Previous nomination/s: Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates/File:Hipp hipp hurra! Konstnärsfest på Skagen - Peder Severin Krøyer.jpg
Nominator: Yomangani ^talk

Delist and replace Certainly not just delist. Yomangani ^talk 23:32, 12 March 2020 (UTC) reply
Delist and replace – Bammesk ( talk) 00:44, 13 March 2020 (UTC) reply
D&R – New version better. – Sca ( talk) 14:32, 13 March 2020 (UTC) reply
Delist and replace. -- Gnosis ( talk) 15:19, 13 March 2020 (UTC) reply
D&R. — David Eppstein ( talk) 05:25, 14 March 2020 (UTC) reply
Replace. MER-C 12:36, 14 March 2020 (UTC) reply

Replaced with File:'Hip, Hip, Hurrah! Artist Festival at Skagen', by Peder Severin Krøyer (1888) Demisted with DXO PhotoLab Clearview; cropped away black border edge.jpg -- Armbrust ^{The Homunculus} 00:39, 23 March 2020 (UTC) reply

Delist and replace: Blue Marble

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 5 Apr 2020 at 03:25:20 (UTC)

Reason: The current FP (24,000 × 12,000 px) is 3.24 times smaller than the suggested replacement image (43,200 × 21,600 pixels), which seems to be the original image resolution as published by NASA. It appears that the former image was shrunk to fit upload limits back in 2006.
Articles this image appears in: Equirectangular projection, Earth observation satellite
Previous nomination/s: Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates/Whole world - land and oceans
Nominator: — RAVENPVFF · talk ·

Delist and replace as nominator — RAVENPVFF · talk · 03:25, 26 March 2020 (UTC) reply
Delist and replace This version seems to be strictly better than the prior. HighInBC ^{Need help? {{ping|HighInBC}}} 04:35, 26 March 2020 (UTC) reply
D&R. — David Eppstein ( talk) 16:44, 26 March 2020 (UTC) reply
Replace. MER-C 14:06, 27 March 2020 (UTC) reply
D&R. Josh Milburn ( talk) 17:05, 27 March 2020 (UTC) reply
D&R - not even sure this needs a vote; an otherwise-identical higher-resolution replacement could just have be uploaded over the top of the original file, I think? But yes, if it is needed, it should obviously pass TSP ( talk) 23:07, 2 April 2020 (UTC) reply

Replaced with File:Blue Marble 2002.png -- Armbrust ^{The Homunculus} 04:20, 5 April 2020 (UTC) reply

Replace: Lady with an Ermine

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 30 Jun 2020 at 12:58:39 (UTC)

Reason: Replace with higher resolution image.
Articles this image appears in: Lady with an Ermine etc.
Previous nomination/s: Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates/Lady with an Ermine
Nominator: MER-C

Replace — MER-C 12:58, 20 June 2020 (UTC) reply
Comment The contrast/saturation doesn't look faithful, judging from museum photos. Adjusting it could be tough due to huge resolution and file size. Brandmeister^talk 16:31, 20 June 2020 (UTC) reply

Brandmeister, the museum that houses a painting is usually the most reliable source, in this case Czartoryski Museum. The version on the museum's website [1] is similar to the proposed replacement. Bammesk ( talk) 19:13, 20 June 2020 (UTC) reply

Replace, though it looks washed out to me. Brandmeister^talk 19:29, 20 June 2020 (UTC) reply

Replace – Bammesk ( talk) 19:13, 20 June 2020 (UTC) reply
Comment Neither look quite right. Charlesjsharp ( talk) 20:06, 20 June 2020 (UTC) reply

Not really sure what you mean Charlesjsharp, could you clarify? At the moment your comment hints of WP:IDONTLIKEIT. Aza24 ( talk) 00:27, 22 June 2020 (UTC) reply

Replace - easy decision, the one being replaced has a yellow hue that completely alters the painting. I have some books in front of me that all have an image of the painting closer to that of the proposed replacement. Aza24 ( talk) 00:27, 22 June 2020 (UTC) reply
Replace Not so. An unworthy suggestion. One looks too yellow, one looks too washed out. But as you have faithfull resproductions, I trust your judgement. Charlesjsharp ( talk) 07:41, 22 June 2020 (UTC) reply
Replace. -- Gnosis ( talk) 17:30, 22 June 2020 (UTC) reply
Replace. — David Eppstein ( talk) 04:59, 23 June 2020 (UTC) reply
Replace || DreamSparrow ^Chat 16:39, 24 June 2020 (UTC) reply

Replaced with File:Lady with an Ermine - Leonardo da Vinci - Google Art Project.jpg -- Armbrust ^{The Homunculus} 14:26, 30 June 2020 (UTC) reply

Delist and Replace: File:Commercial-LBJ1964ElectionAdDaisyGirl.ogv

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 12 Sep 2020 at 06:27:14 (UTC)

Original

Replacement

Reason: The original video was promoted back in 2012. In June of this year, a newer, higher resolution version was uploaded. It even replaced the origninal video at Daisy (advertisement). The newer version looks much better in comparison.
Articles this image appears in: Attack ad, Lyndon B. Johnson, +14
Previous nomination/s: Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates/Daisy
Nominator: GamerPro64

Delist and replace — GamerPro64 06:27, 2 September 2020 (UTC) reply

@ GamerPro64: Just delist, and not also replace? Regards, Armbrust ^{The Homunculus} 19:27, 2 September 2020 (UTC) reply
- Yeah. Did not realize that. GamerPro64 19:34, 2 September 2020 (UTC) reply

Delist & replace - A no-brainer. -- Janke | Talk 07:07, 2 September 2020 (UTC) reply
Delist & replace - Obvious choice. Adam Cuerden ^(
talk)_{Has about 7.4% of all
FPs} 08:07, 2 September 2020 (UTC) reply
Replace. MER-C 18:26, 2 September 2020 (UTC) reply
Delist & replace – Bammesk ( talk) 00:15, 4 September 2020 (UTC) reply
Delist & replace ~~ CAPTAIN MEDUSA ^talk 12:22, 7 September 2020 (UTC) reply

Replaced with File:Daisy (1964).webm -- Armbrust ^{The Homunculus} 21:00, 12 September 2020 (UTC) reply

Delisted

Delist: Willie wag tail

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 16 Feb 2020 at 20:34:17 (UTC)

Reason: Not used in any articles, superceded by recently promoted FP File:Rhipidura leucophrys - Glen Davis.jpg.
Articles this image appears in: None
Previous nomination/s: Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates/Image:Willy wag tail.jpg
Nominator: MER-C

Delist — MER-C 20:34, 6 February 2020 (UTC) reply
Delist for procedural reasons and because the busy background of this one makes the newly-listed alternative a much better choice. — David Eppstein ( talk) 21:06, 6 February 2020 (UTC) reply
Delist Geoffroi 06:51, 7 February 2020 (UTC) reply
Delist -- Janke | Talk 09:40, 7 February 2020 (UTC) reply

Delisted -- Armbrust ^{The Homunculus} 17:39, 17 February 2020 (UTC) reply

Delist: Palace of Fine Arts

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 11 Mar 2020 at 19:11:25 (UTC)

Reason: Replaced by recently promoted FP File:Palace of Fine Arts (16794p).jpg.
Articles this image appears in: None
Previous nomination/s: Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates/Palace of Fine Arts
Nominator: MER-C

Delist — MER-C 19:11, 1 March 2020 (UTC) reply
Delist. Procedural. — David Eppstein ( talk) 19:13, 1 March 2020 (UTC) reply
Delist – Bammesk ( talk) 03:11, 2 March 2020 (UTC) reply
Delist Geoffroi 03:32, 2 March 2020 (UTC) reply
Delist. Josh Milburn ( talk) 18:47, 2 March 2020 (UTC) reply
Delist. -- Gnosis ( talk) 18:49, 2 March 2020 (UTC) reply
Delist -- Basile Morin ( talk) 01:10, 6 March 2020 (UTC) reply

Delisted -- Armbrust ^{The Homunculus} 20:25, 11 March 2020 (UTC) reply

Delist and replace: Neptune

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 15 Mar 2020 at 09:26:16 (UTC)

Reason: Replacing with more natural color image made with synthetic 3rd color layer. As per Talk:Neptune/Archive 5#Infobox image
Articles this image appears in: Neptune, Great Dark Spot, etc.
Previous nomination/s: Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates/Neptune 3
Nominator: JCP2018 ( talk)

Delist and replace — JCP2018 ( talk) 09:26, 5 March 2020 (UTC) reply
Comment The replacement is "synthetic" - but did NASA do it, or is it "original research" by someone else? In any case, it's much smaller than the original, and also failing FPC size criteria. -- Janke | Talk 12:11, 5 March 2020 (UTC) reply

Looks like it's done by "someone else", a personal account on flickr: [2]. The editor might have a good reason for doing it, but still I call it "original research". Bammesk ( talk) 14:09, 7 March 2020 (UTC) reply

Delist, do not replace. The current FP is not used in any articles, and so must be delisted. The replacement is far too small to feature. Josh Milburn ( talk) 18:47, 5 March 2020 (UTC) reply
Delist, do not replace per J Milburn. — David Eppstein ( talk) 19:30, 5 March 2020 (UTC) reply

Delisted -- Armbrust ^{The Homunculus} 12:12, 15 March 2020 (UTC) reply

While the discussion is bellow qourum, this unused image can't retain its featured picture status and is delisted. Armbrust ^{The Homunculus} 12:12, 15 March 2020 (UTC) reply

Delist: Mont St. Michel Spire.JPG

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 13 Apr 2020 at 15:30:26 (UTC)

Reason: Not used in any article and the photo quality is awful
Articles this image appears in: None
Previous nomination/s: Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates/Mont St. Michel Spire
Nominator: Veggies ( talk)

Delist — Veggies ( talk) 15:30, 3 April 2020 (UTC) reply
Delist. — David Eppstein ( talk) 16:47, 3 April 2020 (UTC) reply
Delist. MER-C 19:53, 3 April 2020 (UTC) reply
Delist. TheHistoryBuff101 09:10, 6 April 2020 (UTC) reply
Delist – Bammesk ( talk) 01:25, 8 April 2020 (UTC) reply

Delisted -- Armbrust ^{The Homunculus} 16:04, 13 April 2020 (UTC) reply

Delist: White-fronted bee-eater

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 20 Apr 2020 at 08:36:39 (UTC)

Reason: as agreed during replacment FP voting
Articles this image appears in: White-fronted bee-eater
Previous nomination/s: Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates/File:Merops bullockoides 1 Luc Viatour.jpg
Nominator: Charlesjsharp ( talk)

Delist — Charlesjsharp ( talk) 08:36, 10 April 2020 (UTC) reply
Delist per Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates/White-fronted bee-eater. MER-C 10:35, 10 April 2020 (UTC) reply
Delist. — David Eppstein ( talk) 16:35, 10 April 2020 (UTC) reply
Delist – Bammesk ( talk) 00:14, 11 April 2020 (UTC) reply
Delist per Charlesjsharp. -- Gnosis ( talk) 21:53, 18 April 2020 (UTC) reply

Delisted -- Armbrust ^{The Homunculus} 13:36, 20 April 2020 (UTC) reply

Delist: Lower Manhattan, 2006

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 23 Apr 2020 at 22:34:47 (UTC)

Lower Manhattan in 2006

Reason: Qualitatively, it's fine, but it is no longer used on any articles where it has any encyclopedic value. One article is of the Staten Island Ferry, which does not appear in the picture. The second is of a general article on architects, having nothing to do with New York exclusively, where the picture appears on the bottom, below the citations, without any caption or relevance. Additionally, there are TWO featured pictures that could easily replace this one in both articles. The first is File:Staten Island Ferry terminal.jpg. The second is File:Lower Manhattan from Jersey City November 2014 panorama 3.jpg.
Articles this image appears in: Staten Island Ferry, Architectural engineer (PE)
Previous nomination/s: Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates/Lower Manhattan
Nominator: Veggies ( talk)

Delist — Veggies ( talk) 22:34, 13 April 2020 (UTC) reply
Delist per nom; also obsolete (without historical significance) since the new WTC has been built. – John M Wolfson ( talk • contribs) 01:13, 14 April 2020 (UTC) reply
Keep This remains a very high quality photo, and photo showing lower Manhattan's skyline during the period between the terrorist attack and the completion of the new WTC is of considerable historical significance. I imagine it could be used in articles on the aftermath of the terrorist attack or the history of New York City. Nick-D ( talk) 11:12, 14 April 2020 (UTC) reply
Delist per above -- mcshadypl ^T ^C 04:21, 15 April 2020 (UTC) reply
Delist per above. -- Gnosis ( talk) 00:09, 20 April 2020 (UTC) reply
Delist, inadequate EV for current article usage. — David Eppstein ( talk) 18:21, 21 April 2020 (UTC) reply
Keep Agree with Nick-D, great quality considering this was taken from a boat. —kallerna 11:27, 23 April 2020 (UTC) reply

Delisted -- Armbrust ^{The Homunculus} 22:47, 23 April 2020 (UTC) reply

Delist: Atmosphere of Jupiter

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 26 Apr 2020 at 08:30:31 (UTC)

Reason: This image is not used in any articles, and has no longer EV.
Articles this image appears in: None
Previous nomination/s: Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates/Jupiter from Voyager 1.jpg
Nominator: JCP2018 ( talk)

Delist — JCP2018 ( talk) 08:30, 16 April 2020 (UTC) reply
Delist – procedural, unused. Bammesk ( talk) 03:26, 21 April 2020 (UTC) reply
Delist. — David Eppstein ( talk) 18:23, 21 April 2020 (UTC) reply
Delist. MER-C 19:38, 21 April 2020 (UTC) reply
Delist - Not used. -- Veggies ( talk) 20:24, 25 April 2020 (UTC) reply

Delisted -- Armbrust ^{The Homunculus} 09:07, 26 April 2020 (UTC) reply

Delist: File:Anschlusstears.jpg

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 15 Jul 2020 at 01:40:37 (UTC)

Sudeten German woman cries while performing Nazi salute during the annexation of Sudetenland, 1938

Reason: Unfortunately, the image looks overprocessed (compare lower res Bundesarchiv version). It also has limited encyclopedic value because this reaction was decidedly the minority one among Sudeten Germans.
Articles this image appears in: Previously used in History of Czechoslovakia where it has little EV; I replaced with File:Bundesarchiv Bild 146-1970-005-28, Anschluss sudetendeutscher Gebiete.jpg as sadly this was a more typical scene. Not currently used in any mainspace articles.
Previous nomination/s: Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates/June-2007
Nominator: ( t · c) buidhe

Delist — ( t · c) buidhe 01:40, 5 July 2020 (UTC) reply
Delist Not being used is enough to delist in and of itself. Exceedingly harsh shadows. Adam Cuerden ^(
talk)_{Has about 7.3% of all
FPs} 16:48, 5 July 2020 (UTC) reply
Delist – unused, and this version shows more of what there was (more encyclopedic). Bammesk ( talk) 23:22, 5 July 2020 (UTC) reply
Delist - It's a misleading, cropped version of a much larger picture. -- Veggies ( talk) 15:20, 10 July 2020 (UTC) reply
Delist. — David Eppstein ( talk) 16:36, 12 July 2020 (UTC) reply

Delisted -- Armbrust ^{The Homunculus} 02:40, 15 July 2020 (UTC) reply

Delist: Suicide of two Japanese Imperial Marines

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 16 Jul 2020 at 16:37:27 (UTC)

Courtesy collapse of graphic content on a page not about the graphic content, and which is being actively used for other content
The following discussion has been closed. Please do not modify it.
Two Japanese Imperial Marines who committed suicide by shooting themselves rather than surrender to U.S. Marines, Tarawa, Gilbert Islands in the Pacific.

Reason: I don't want to delist this for being graphic. We've had dead bodies on the Wikipedia mainpage before; we'll probably have them again. But it's such a bad reproduction of the photo that my urge for not censoring the main page wars with the overblown whites and dismal dark of the shadows. It's from 2007. That probably explains a lot.
Articles this image appears in: Battle of Tarawa, Death and culture
Previous nomination/s: Wikipedia:Featured_picture_candidates/December-2007#Suicide_of_two_Imperial_Japanese_Marines
Nominator: Adam Cuerden ^(
talk)_{Has about 7.3% of all
FPs}

Delist — Adam Cuerden ^(
talk)_{Has about 7.3% of all
FPs} 16:37, 6 July 2020 (UTC) reply
Delist quality is not sufficient. Well under 1500 x 1500 px, even without the lighting issues. ( t · c) buidhe 21:41, 6 July 2020 (UTC) reply
Delist -- Andrei ( talk) 07:10, 7 July 2020 (UTC) reply
Delist Same reason as my oppose back then: Quality low, and in no way a unique picture. -- Janke | Talk 15:12, 7 July 2020 (UTC) reply
Delist. — David Eppstein ( talk) 04:14, 8 July 2020 (UTC) reply

Delisted -- Armbrust ^{The Homunculus} 17:55, 16 July 2020 (UTC) reply

Delist: 1917 surrender of Jerusalem

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 16 Aug 2020 at 11:48:56 (UTC)

Reason: A person was cropped out on the left. The flag - somewhat transparent in the original, as befits one with a bright sky behind it, has been turned solid. It's just an over-manipulated image.
Articles this image appears in: 19th Battalion, London Regiment (St Pancras), 60th (2/2nd London) Division, Battle of Jerusalem, History of Jerusalem, Mandatory Palestine, Partition of the Ottoman Empire, Southern Palestine Offensive, Timelines of Ottoman Syria history
Previous nomination/s: Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates/1917 surrender of Jerusalem
Nominator: Adam Cuerden ^(
talk)_{Has about 7.4% of all
FPs}

Delist — Adam Cuerden ^(
talk)_{Has about 7.4% of all
FPs} 11:48, 6 August 2020 (UTC) reply
Delist Charlesjsharp ( talk) 18:47, 6 August 2020 (UTC) reply
Delist -- Gnosis ( talk) 16:09, 9 August 2020 (UTC) reply
Delist. MER-C 19:08, 11 August 2020 (UTC) reply
Delist. — David Eppstein ( talk) 21:04, 11 August 2020 (UTC) reply

Delisted -- Armbrust ^{The Homunculus} 12:28, 16 August 2020 (UTC) reply

Delist: Chitra Dewi

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 20 Aug 2020 at 11:56:05 (UTC)

Reason: Previously misidentified; we do not have an article on this artist yet.
Articles this image appears in: None
Previous nomination/s: Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates/Chitra Dewi
Nominator: — Chris Woodrich ( talk)

Delist — — Chris Woodrich ( talk) 11:56, 10 August 2020 (UTC) reply
Nice to see you back! Delist unless we can get Wikipedia:WikiProject Women in Red to work up an article soon. Adam Cuerden ^(
talk)_{Has about 7.4% of all
FPs} 14:55, 10 August 2020 (UTC) reply
Delist as per Adam. -- Gnosis ( talk) 17:11, 10 August 2020 (UTC) reply
Delist – Bammesk ( talk) 01:11, 11 August 2020 (UTC) reply
Delist. MER-C 18:38, 11 August 2020 (UTC) reply
Delist. — David Eppstein ( talk) 21:01, 11 August 2020 (UTC) reply
Comment: Good to see you back, Chris, even if it is just for the odd housekeeping matter. I note that we have min:Roosilawaty and id:Roosilawaty, so this image may be a good addition to those articles at least. Josh Milburn ( talk) 20:25, 12 August 2020 (UTC) reply
- @ J Milburn: I know it's a pain, but not putting a colon before links to other language Wikipedias used to be how the sidebar was populated with articles in other languages, and it technically still works, meaning your statement came out as "I note that we have and, so this image may be a good addition to those articles." I've fixed it for you by adding a colon before "min:Roosilawaty" and "id:Roosilawaty". Adam Cuerden ^(
  talk)_{Has about 7.4% of all
  FPs} 11:49, 13 August 2020 (UTC) reply
  - Yes, good spot! Josh Milburn ( talk) 14:19, 13 August 2020 (UTC) reply
    - I probably over-explained. I just really hate editing other people's comments, y'know? Adam Cuerden ^(
      talk)_{Has about 7.4% of all
      FPs} 16:35, 13 August 2020 (UTC) reply
Comment Are there any barriers to creating a stub on Roosilawaty to save this FP? (not notable per WP:BIO or similar?) Google Books shows some resources on her, but they're unfortunately almost all in Indonesian. Nick-D ( talk) 02:31, 14 August 2020 (UTC) reply

And decent enough articles on a couple of other Wikipedias. I've asked at WikiProject Indonesia. Josh Milburn ( talk) 13:13, 14 August 2020 (UTC) reply

Comment: Is there any chance we could put this on hold for a week or two to see if we can rustle up an article? Josh Milburn ( talk) 13:15, 14 August 2020 (UTC) reply
- I'd support that, as it seems likely that a stub could be created. Nick-D ( talk) 05:12, 15 August 2020 (UTC) reply
Comment: We also have another nice image of Chitra Dewi: File:Chitra Dewi, c. 1960, by Tati Studio.jpg. @ Adam Cuerden: In your view, would it have a shot? Josh Milburn ( talk) 13:27, 14 August 2020 (UTC) reply

@ J Milburn: I have some slight doubts about some of the proportions in that image. Her head looks a little stretched, and maybe that's just an optical illusion, but it's odd enough that I'd want some confirmation of the scan before proceeding. Adam Cuerden ^(
talk)_{Has about 7.4% of all
FPs} 23:29, 15 August 2020 (UTC) reply

Delisted -- Armbrust ^{The Homunculus} 15:34, 25 August 2020 (UTC) reply