Comment Can't expect more DOF from a single frame picture with a
Canon MP-E 65mm f/2.8 1-5x Macro lens, if my assumption on the lens he used is right.
Jumping spiders are restless (see how she tries to attack the lens); so less chance for a
focus stacked picture for a live specimen.
JKadavoorJee 16:53, 17 April 2013 (UTC)reply
Weak support It's expecting too much of a macro shot like this to ask for all the legs to be in focus as well. The image hardly seems to be downsampled and taken at around 2x magnification! --
Muhammad(talk) 03:43, 18 April 2013 (UTC)reply
Comment: I have seen pictures of spiders where not only the body is sharp, but also the legs too.
ArcticKangaroo 14:09, 18 April 2013 (UTC)reply
Probably bigger spiders and not the jumping kind. These are minute and hardly sit steady --
Muhammad(talk) 18:36, 18 April 2013 (UTC)reply
Comment. Just to give you an idea, this spider is approximately 3 mm in length – about the size of a large ant.
Kaldari (
talk) 20:04, 18 April 2013 (UTC)reply
Weak Support. While the picture is not of excellent quality, it is my view it would be very difficult to achieve better results in terms of depth of field. --
WingtipvorteXPTT∅ 18:13, 19 April 2013 (UTC)reply
Support While I agree it would be better if the legs were in focus, the technical challenges involved in doing so make it an unrealistic standard.
Rreagan007 (
talk) 03:21, 22 April 2013 (UTC)reply
Support as creator. I guess I'm biased though :)
Kaldari (
talk) 07:01, 23 April 2013 (UTC)reply
Promoted File:Kaldari Zygoballus rufipes female 02.jpg --
King of♥♦♣ ♠ 20:40, 30 April 2013 (UTC)reply
Comment Can't expect more DOF from a single frame picture with a
Canon MP-E 65mm f/2.8 1-5x Macro lens, if my assumption on the lens he used is right.
Jumping spiders are restless (see how she tries to attack the lens); so less chance for a
focus stacked picture for a live specimen.
JKadavoorJee 16:53, 17 April 2013 (UTC)reply
Weak support It's expecting too much of a macro shot like this to ask for all the legs to be in focus as well. The image hardly seems to be downsampled and taken at around 2x magnification! --
Muhammad(talk) 03:43, 18 April 2013 (UTC)reply
Comment: I have seen pictures of spiders where not only the body is sharp, but also the legs too.
ArcticKangaroo 14:09, 18 April 2013 (UTC)reply
Probably bigger spiders and not the jumping kind. These are minute and hardly sit steady --
Muhammad(talk) 18:36, 18 April 2013 (UTC)reply
Comment. Just to give you an idea, this spider is approximately 3 mm in length – about the size of a large ant.
Kaldari (
talk) 20:04, 18 April 2013 (UTC)reply
Weak Support. While the picture is not of excellent quality, it is my view it would be very difficult to achieve better results in terms of depth of field. --
WingtipvorteXPTT∅ 18:13, 19 April 2013 (UTC)reply
Support While I agree it would be better if the legs were in focus, the technical challenges involved in doing so make it an unrealistic standard.
Rreagan007 (
talk) 03:21, 22 April 2013 (UTC)reply
Support as creator. I guess I'm biased though :)
Kaldari (
talk) 07:01, 23 April 2013 (UTC)reply
Promoted File:Kaldari Zygoballus rufipes female 02.jpg --
King of♥♦♣ ♠ 20:40, 30 April 2013 (UTC)reply