The Turkish Wikipedia may have much lower standards than the English WP, as they do not have nearly so many images or contributors. As for Commons, they usually have higher standards than we do - having looked at the Quality Images requirements page there, I feel it doesn't meet the criteria. I may nominate it for delisting there when I've found out how to do so. I've also corrected your links in that comment - they were broken. —
Vanderdecken∴ ∫ξφ19:22, 21 May 2008 (UTC)reply
Oppose Very grainy and blown. As to that fact that it is featured elsewhere, that is why each wiki has its own approval process- what passed on the Commons may not pass here.
Clegs (
talk)
17:47, 21 May 2008 (UTC)reply
The Turkish Wikipedia may have much lower standards than the English WP, as they do not have nearly so many images or contributors. As for Commons, they usually have higher standards than we do - having looked at the Quality Images requirements page there, I feel it doesn't meet the criteria. I may nominate it for delisting there when I've found out how to do so. I've also corrected your links in that comment - they were broken. —
Vanderdecken∴ ∫ξφ19:22, 21 May 2008 (UTC)reply
Oppose Very grainy and blown. As to that fact that it is featured elsewhere, that is why each wiki has its own approval process- what passed on the Commons may not pass here.
Clegs (
talk)
17:47, 21 May 2008 (UTC)reply