Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 23 Oct 2014 at 11:29:23 (UTC)
- Reason
- Original image is 3,123 × 4,888 pixels, high technical standard, Is among Wikipedia's best work and the main infobox image of article Tiger, Has a free license, helps readers to understand Tiger article, facts are supported by sources.
- Articles in which this image appears
- Tiger, Jim Corbett National Park (GA class article)
- FP category for this image
- Wikipedia:Featured pictures/Animals/Mammals
- Creator
- Sumeet Moghe
- Support as nominator – Jim Carter 11:29, 13 October 2014 (UTC)
- Oppose this version. Insane level of JPG artefacting. — Crisco 1492 ( talk) 11:45, 13 October 2014 (UTC)
- @ Crisco 1492: Can you please clarify? There are three versions available of this image, will reverting to an older version can fix the problem? Thanks, Jim Carter (from public cyber) 11:53, 13 October 2014 (UTC)
- The one which was current at the time of my post. The one which is now current is a bit better, but I'm still not sure it's featured quality. — Crisco 1492 ( talk) 12:23, 13 October 2014 (UTC)
- @ Crisco 1492: Please reconsider. I have checked the criteria before nominating it. And I didn't found anything of a trouble. And honestly there are not many Bengal tiger's picture exist here of even this quality. Can you please clarify your !vote with reference to the criteria? Jim Carter (from public cyber) 13:13, 13 October 2014 (UTC)
- Oppose, Great shot, and rare and surely a good asset for the article in all possible ways. However to be a Featured picture, it is not centered. The animal is to the left. Hafspajen ( talk) 13:16, 13 October 2014 (UTC)
- Withdraw Thanks @ Hafspajen:, now I understood the problem. Jim Carter (from public cyber) 13:25, 13 October 2014 (UTC)
- Please try to find other pictures to us, you are on the right way. You can always ask Crisco for example if you are not sure about it, I do that often. In this way you can be more sure about it. If I am in doubt (and that happens often) I always ask others before nominate a picture, as a second oppinion, you know. You have a talent in finding great shots, don't give up! This is a striking picture too, certainly. Hafspajen ( talk) 14:23, 13 October 2014 (UTC)
- Thanks, Hafspajen. This is a totally different field and I should admit that this was my first time here (I don't really work with files). I will go ahead and find some more pics and before nominating them I will ask you and Crisco. Thanks again, it was good experience for me. And I think this discussion can be closed speedily per WP:SNOW. Jim Carter (from public cyber) 15:49, 13 October 2014 (UTC)
Not Promoted -- Armbrust The Homunculus 02:51, 14 October 2014 (UTC)
Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 23 Oct 2014 at 11:29:23 (UTC)
- Reason
- Original image is 3,123 × 4,888 pixels, high technical standard, Is among Wikipedia's best work and the main infobox image of article Tiger, Has a free license, helps readers to understand Tiger article, facts are supported by sources.
- Articles in which this image appears
- Tiger, Jim Corbett National Park (GA class article)
- FP category for this image
- Wikipedia:Featured pictures/Animals/Mammals
- Creator
- Sumeet Moghe
- Support as nominator – Jim Carter 11:29, 13 October 2014 (UTC)
- Oppose this version. Insane level of JPG artefacting. — Crisco 1492 ( talk) 11:45, 13 October 2014 (UTC)
- @ Crisco 1492: Can you please clarify? There are three versions available of this image, will reverting to an older version can fix the problem? Thanks, Jim Carter (from public cyber) 11:53, 13 October 2014 (UTC)
- The one which was current at the time of my post. The one which is now current is a bit better, but I'm still not sure it's featured quality. — Crisco 1492 ( talk) 12:23, 13 October 2014 (UTC)
- @ Crisco 1492: Please reconsider. I have checked the criteria before nominating it. And I didn't found anything of a trouble. And honestly there are not many Bengal tiger's picture exist here of even this quality. Can you please clarify your !vote with reference to the criteria? Jim Carter (from public cyber) 13:13, 13 October 2014 (UTC)
- Oppose, Great shot, and rare and surely a good asset for the article in all possible ways. However to be a Featured picture, it is not centered. The animal is to the left. Hafspajen ( talk) 13:16, 13 October 2014 (UTC)
- Withdraw Thanks @ Hafspajen:, now I understood the problem. Jim Carter (from public cyber) 13:25, 13 October 2014 (UTC)
- Please try to find other pictures to us, you are on the right way. You can always ask Crisco for example if you are not sure about it, I do that often. In this way you can be more sure about it. If I am in doubt (and that happens often) I always ask others before nominate a picture, as a second oppinion, you know. You have a talent in finding great shots, don't give up! This is a striking picture too, certainly. Hafspajen ( talk) 14:23, 13 October 2014 (UTC)
- Thanks, Hafspajen. This is a totally different field and I should admit that this was my first time here (I don't really work with files). I will go ahead and find some more pics and before nominating them I will ask you and Crisco. Thanks again, it was good experience for me. And I think this discussion can be closed speedily per WP:SNOW. Jim Carter (from public cyber) 15:49, 13 October 2014 (UTC)
Not Promoted -- Armbrust The Homunculus 02:51, 14 October 2014 (UTC)