Support as nominator --
Tomer T (
talk) 18:15, 21 September 2012 (UTC)reply
And Support alt.
Tomer T (
talk) 17:10, 26 September 2012 (UTC)reply
Oppose original The image quality is there, but I dislike the composition. I would expect an image featuring water pollution to give slightly more context to the debris.
Jujutacular (
talk) 21:05, 22 September 2012 (UTC)reply
I added an alternative. Is that what you mean by more context?
Tomer T (
talk) 08:05, 24 September 2012 (UTC)reply
That is better, although it still doesn't seem quite there for me. I can't really put my finger on what would make it better though, so I abstain on the alt.
Jujutacular (
talk) 14:31, 26 September 2012 (UTC)reply
Support High quality and much EV.
Alborzagros (
talk) 13:33, 23 September 2012 (UTC)reply
Weak oppose agree with Jujutacular that more context would add to the EV. Pine✉ 05:15, 24 September 2012 (UTC)reply
Support alt: it could provide more context that that, but that would be a fundamentally different picture: the two could co-exist. This one tells us quite a lot about the nature and volume of water pollution on Lake Maracaibo, which, given what it shows must be a central part of an article on the lake.Grandiose(
me,
talk,
contribs) 14:17, 26 September 2012 (UTC)reply
Weak Support Alt better context, though more would be even better. Focus is slightly off. --
WingtipvorteXPTT∅ 19:53, 26 September 2012 (UTC)reply
Oppose: The view feels too arbitrary in both. Would be improved with a wider angle of view or a larger panorama, catching more of the shoreline, a longer length of debris, and the bank, so that it's a composition instead of a snapshot.
Julia\
talk 19:24, 29 September 2012 (UTC)reply
Support as nominator --
Tomer T (
talk) 18:15, 21 September 2012 (UTC)reply
And Support alt.
Tomer T (
talk) 17:10, 26 September 2012 (UTC)reply
Oppose original The image quality is there, but I dislike the composition. I would expect an image featuring water pollution to give slightly more context to the debris.
Jujutacular (
talk) 21:05, 22 September 2012 (UTC)reply
I added an alternative. Is that what you mean by more context?
Tomer T (
talk) 08:05, 24 September 2012 (UTC)reply
That is better, although it still doesn't seem quite there for me. I can't really put my finger on what would make it better though, so I abstain on the alt.
Jujutacular (
talk) 14:31, 26 September 2012 (UTC)reply
Support High quality and much EV.
Alborzagros (
talk) 13:33, 23 September 2012 (UTC)reply
Weak oppose agree with Jujutacular that more context would add to the EV. Pine✉ 05:15, 24 September 2012 (UTC)reply
Support alt: it could provide more context that that, but that would be a fundamentally different picture: the two could co-exist. This one tells us quite a lot about the nature and volume of water pollution on Lake Maracaibo, which, given what it shows must be a central part of an article on the lake.Grandiose(
me,
talk,
contribs) 14:17, 26 September 2012 (UTC)reply
Weak Support Alt better context, though more would be even better. Focus is slightly off. --
WingtipvorteXPTT∅ 19:53, 26 September 2012 (UTC)reply
Oppose: The view feels too arbitrary in both. Would be improved with a wider angle of view or a larger panorama, catching more of the shoreline, a longer length of debris, and the bank, so that it's a composition instead of a snapshot.
Julia\
talk 19:24, 29 September 2012 (UTC)reply