- Reason
- Has Nice Colours. It is simple and representative. Has a free license (Creative Commons) and adds value to an article.
- Articles this image appears in
- Nicaragua
- Creator
- Aaron1a12
- Support as nominator -- Aaron1a12 ( talk) 22:53, 8 July 2008 (UTC)
- Oppose barring a good cleanup: it looks rather noisy. Fletcher ( talk) 23:34, 8 July 2008 (UTC)
- Weak oppose. The vignetting seems a little heavy, plus it doesn't add much encyclopedic value to Nicaragua. Kaldari ( talk) 00:16, 9 July 2008 (UTC)
- Could be a good addition to Lake Nicaragua. Fletcher ( talk) 01:00, 9 July 2008 (UTC)
- Oppose too noisy. smooth0707 ( talk) 01:24, 9 July 2008 (UTC)
- Oppose. Noise isn't really the major issue. The vignetting is not encyclopaedic and I don't think its really possible to learn much from the image. Diliff | (Talk) (Contribs) 08:33, 9 July 2008 (UTC)
- Oppose - technical and encyclopaedic quality is low.-- Svetovid ( talk) 09:13, 9 July 2008 (UTC)
- Oppose. Don't know why you added the vignetting, but it ruined it. Clegs ( talk) 15:29, 9 July 2008 (UTC)
- Oppose per the points mentioned above: vignetting, extreme noise, low encyclopedic value. — αἰτίας • discussion• 21:14, 9 July 2008 (UTC)
- Comment: I suppose it does add some value to Cocibolca, as it is the lake the island is in. Spencer T♦ C 01:30, 10 July 2008 (UTC)
- Whoops...didn't realize Fletcher's comment above was the same lake. Spencer T♦ C 01:32, 10 July 2008 (UTC)
Not promoted MER-C 06:33, 14 July 2008 (UTC)
- Reason
- Has Nice Colours. It is simple and representative. Has a free license (Creative Commons) and adds value to an article.
- Articles this image appears in
- Nicaragua
- Creator
- Aaron1a12
- Support as nominator -- Aaron1a12 ( talk) 22:53, 8 July 2008 (UTC)
- Oppose barring a good cleanup: it looks rather noisy. Fletcher ( talk) 23:34, 8 July 2008 (UTC)
- Weak oppose. The vignetting seems a little heavy, plus it doesn't add much encyclopedic value to Nicaragua. Kaldari ( talk) 00:16, 9 July 2008 (UTC)
- Could be a good addition to Lake Nicaragua. Fletcher ( talk) 01:00, 9 July 2008 (UTC)
- Oppose too noisy. smooth0707 ( talk) 01:24, 9 July 2008 (UTC)
- Oppose. Noise isn't really the major issue. The vignetting is not encyclopaedic and I don't think its really possible to learn much from the image. Diliff | (Talk) (Contribs) 08:33, 9 July 2008 (UTC)
- Oppose - technical and encyclopaedic quality is low.-- Svetovid ( talk) 09:13, 9 July 2008 (UTC)
- Oppose. Don't know why you added the vignetting, but it ruined it. Clegs ( talk) 15:29, 9 July 2008 (UTC)
- Oppose per the points mentioned above: vignetting, extreme noise, low encyclopedic value. — αἰτίας • discussion• 21:14, 9 July 2008 (UTC)
- Comment: I suppose it does add some value to Cocibolca, as it is the lake the island is in. Spencer T♦ C 01:30, 10 July 2008 (UTC)
- Whoops...didn't realize Fletcher's comment above was the same lake. Spencer T♦ C 01:32, 10 July 2008 (UTC)
Not promoted MER-C 06:33, 14 July 2008 (UTC)