Voting period ends on 25 Jan 2012 at 22:30:03 (UTC)
- Reason
- Technical details first: it's over 1,000 pixels wide, it's not fair use and I don't think it's been photoshopped (2, 4, 8). I would argue that it passes (1) as the lady is in focus and I can't detect any graininess. I feel that it both represents an aspect of Sherry people might not have been aware of otherwise (5) and is striking (3). I think the caption is succinct for (7), but there's more metadata at the original that could be added. I must confess I don't really understand what you mean by (6).
- Articles in which this image appears
- Sherry
- FP category for this image
- Culture and lifestyle
- Creator
- Jesus Solana
- Support as nominator It Is Me Here t / c 22:30, 15 January 2012 (UTC)
- Comment: The image is not currently used in any articles.
J Milburn (
talk)
22:58, 15 January 2012 (UTC)
- Sorry, that was because of a file name move; should be fixed now. It Is Me Here t / c 23:21, 15 January 2012 (UTC)
- Question Is there any reason for the black and white? Have you considered asking the author for a colour copy? (6) is more applicable to diagrams and stuff, which need references. JJ Harrison ( talk) 05:13, 16 January 2012 (UTC)
- Oppose just to get a vote on this. Significant artifacting through overcompression, harsh flash - the unnecessary b&w is indeed 'masking' a number of flaws that would be more apparent in colour. -- jjron ( talk) 03:07, 22 January 2012 (UTC)
- Oppose I concur with the points jjron made. Also, the image lacks the proper context in the article, as we don't have much understanding of what a venenciadora is. A shame about these points though, it is otherwise a nice submission for FP. Jujutacular talk 13:46, 24 January 2012 (UTC)
- Agreed. In general it's a good image and EV would be pretty good. -- jjron ( talk) 17:06, 25 January 2012 (UTC)
Not Promoted -- Makeemlighter ( talk) 22:14, 25 January 2012 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 25 Jan 2012 at 22:30:03 (UTC)
- Reason
- Technical details first: it's over 1,000 pixels wide, it's not fair use and I don't think it's been photoshopped (2, 4, 8). I would argue that it passes (1) as the lady is in focus and I can't detect any graininess. I feel that it both represents an aspect of Sherry people might not have been aware of otherwise (5) and is striking (3). I think the caption is succinct for (7), but there's more metadata at the original that could be added. I must confess I don't really understand what you mean by (6).
- Articles in which this image appears
- Sherry
- FP category for this image
- Culture and lifestyle
- Creator
- Jesus Solana
- Support as nominator It Is Me Here t / c 22:30, 15 January 2012 (UTC)
- Comment: The image is not currently used in any articles.
J Milburn (
talk)
22:58, 15 January 2012 (UTC)
- Sorry, that was because of a file name move; should be fixed now. It Is Me Here t / c 23:21, 15 January 2012 (UTC)
- Question Is there any reason for the black and white? Have you considered asking the author for a colour copy? (6) is more applicable to diagrams and stuff, which need references. JJ Harrison ( talk) 05:13, 16 January 2012 (UTC)
- Oppose just to get a vote on this. Significant artifacting through overcompression, harsh flash - the unnecessary b&w is indeed 'masking' a number of flaws that would be more apparent in colour. -- jjron ( talk) 03:07, 22 January 2012 (UTC)
- Oppose I concur with the points jjron made. Also, the image lacks the proper context in the article, as we don't have much understanding of what a venenciadora is. A shame about these points though, it is otherwise a nice submission for FP. Jujutacular talk 13:46, 24 January 2012 (UTC)
- Agreed. In general it's a good image and EV would be pretty good. -- jjron ( talk) 17:06, 25 January 2012 (UTC)
Not Promoted -- Makeemlighter ( talk) 22:14, 25 January 2012 (UTC)