Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 16 Feb 2015 at 10:02:14 (UTC)
.jpg)
- Reason
- A good-quality aerial shot. far better at showing the layout and environs than anything else we have.
- Articles in which this image appears
- Vaxholm Fortress
- FP category for this image
- These seem to end up in Wikipedia:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture
- Creator
- Arild Vågen
- Support as nominator – Adam Cuerden ( talk) 10:02, 6 February 2015 (UTC)
- Support - USeful. — Crisco 1492 ( talk) 12:58, 6 February 2015 (UTC)
- Support Would be nice if the article could be expanded, as it's an interesting looking building, with a good history, yet there's only really a weak annacdote giving anything of interest to read within it. That said, this picture is fine (if a tad low res compared to modern photography) so I will support... gazhiley 13:20, 6 February 2015 (UTC)
- Support - Hey, this is Vaxholm! I use to sail pass this one. Hafspajen ( talk) 14:08, 6 February 2015 (UTC)
- Comment – Interesting scene, but pic looks a bit thin.
Sca (
talk)
14:32, 6 February 2015 (UTC)
- "Thin"? Adam Cuerden ( talk) 16:43, 6 February 2015 (UTC)
- Well, a bit faint or under-contrasty, due to light colors & bright sun. But I guess I could be persuaded.
Sca (
talk)
18:44, 6 February 2015 (UTC)
- Ah, I see what you mean. But given it's winter - which adds a lot of white snow and ice, it's probably natural enough... Adam Cuerden ( talk) 19:11, 6 February 2015 (UTC)
- Well, a bit faint or under-contrasty, due to light colors & bright sun. But I guess I could be persuaded.
Sca (
talk)
18:44, 6 February 2015 (UTC)
- Support – OK. Looks better at greater res. Sca ( talk) 22:01, 6 February 2015 (UTC)
- May I suggest Wikipedia:Featured pictures/Places/Urban as category? Hafspajen ( talk) 22:17, 6 February 2015 (UTC)
- That might make sense. Armbrust? Adam Cuerden ( talk) 10:00, 7 February 2015 (UTC)
- The picture is about a fortification, and therefore Architecture is IMO better. Armbrust The Homunculus 11:59, 8 February 2015 (UTC)
- Support - Useful, and nice image.-- Godot13 ( talk) 09:06, 7 February 2015 (UTC)
- Support - Nice photo, well lit with nice contrast. talk→ WPPilot 14:54, 7 February 2015 (UTC)
- Support - Very nice. Jobas ( talk) 19:38, 8 February 2015 (UTC)
- Support Excellent photo with good EV Nick-D ( talk) 07:54, 9 February 2015 (UTC)
Promoted File:Vaxholmsleden February 2013 02 (crop).jpg -- - T H ( here I am) 10:10, 16 February 2015 (UTC)
- 9 support, 0 oppose - T H ( here I am) 10:10, 16 February 2015 (UTC)
Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 16 Feb 2015 at 10:02:14 (UTC)
- Reason
- A good-quality aerial shot. far better at showing the layout and environs than anything else we have.
- Articles in which this image appears
- Vaxholm Fortress
- FP category for this image
- These seem to end up in Wikipedia:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture
- Creator
- Arild Vågen
- Support as nominator – Adam Cuerden ( talk) 10:02, 6 February 2015 (UTC)
- Support - USeful. — Crisco 1492 ( talk) 12:58, 6 February 2015 (UTC)
- Support Would be nice if the article could be expanded, as it's an interesting looking building, with a good history, yet there's only really a weak annacdote giving anything of interest to read within it. That said, this picture is fine (if a tad low res compared to modern photography) so I will support... gazhiley 13:20, 6 February 2015 (UTC)
- Support - Hey, this is Vaxholm! I use to sail pass this one. Hafspajen ( talk) 14:08, 6 February 2015 (UTC)
- Comment – Interesting scene, but pic looks a bit thin.
Sca (
talk)
14:32, 6 February 2015 (UTC)
- "Thin"? Adam Cuerden ( talk) 16:43, 6 February 2015 (UTC)
- Well, a bit faint or under-contrasty, due to light colors & bright sun. But I guess I could be persuaded.
Sca (
talk)
18:44, 6 February 2015 (UTC)
- Ah, I see what you mean. But given it's winter - which adds a lot of white snow and ice, it's probably natural enough... Adam Cuerden ( talk) 19:11, 6 February 2015 (UTC)
- Well, a bit faint or under-contrasty, due to light colors & bright sun. But I guess I could be persuaded.
Sca (
talk)
18:44, 6 February 2015 (UTC)
- Support – OK. Looks better at greater res. Sca ( talk) 22:01, 6 February 2015 (UTC)
- May I suggest Wikipedia:Featured pictures/Places/Urban as category? Hafspajen ( talk) 22:17, 6 February 2015 (UTC)
- That might make sense. Armbrust? Adam Cuerden ( talk) 10:00, 7 February 2015 (UTC)
- The picture is about a fortification, and therefore Architecture is IMO better. Armbrust The Homunculus 11:59, 8 February 2015 (UTC)
- Support - Useful, and nice image.-- Godot13 ( talk) 09:06, 7 February 2015 (UTC)
- Support - Nice photo, well lit with nice contrast. talk→ WPPilot 14:54, 7 February 2015 (UTC)
- Support - Very nice. Jobas ( talk) 19:38, 8 February 2015 (UTC)
- Support Excellent photo with good EV Nick-D ( talk) 07:54, 9 February 2015 (UTC)
Promoted File:Vaxholmsleden February 2013 02 (crop).jpg -- - T H ( here I am) 10:10, 16 February 2015 (UTC)
- 9 support, 0 oppose - T H ( here I am) 10:10, 16 February 2015 (UTC)