Very high quality and detailed image of vampire bat that meets the featured picture criteria. This image is used throughout many articles on wikipedia, and greatly depicts this famous creature.
Support for a bloodsucking little monster it sure is cute.
DurovaCharge! 02:04, 20 January 2008 (UTC)reply
Oppose Not very sharp, cut off at the top, and I can't really see much (do these things have wings?)--
HereToHelp 02:39, 20 January 2008 (UTC)reply
Is that really a question, or are you just suggesting that you can't clearly see the wings? (If it's really a question you could look at the articles). --
jjron (
talk) 07:08, 20 January 2008 (UTC)reply
Oppose Seems to me to be slightly artifacted, plus it's not composed very well.
Clegs (
talk) 03:31, 20 January 2008 (UTC)reply
Oppose - bad composition (feet cut off, I'd like to see how it's hanging), noisy, not sharp, harsh shadow. There could be much better photographs taken. —
Vanderdecken∴ ∫ξφ 11:55, 20 January 2008 (UTC)reply
Oppose It lacks the quality of something truly stunning and I don't like the composition and the lighting.
Chris.B 14:52, 20 January 2008 (UTC)reply
Oppose Feet are a must. --Sharkface217 01:58, 21 January 2008 (UTC)reply
Weak oppose. If WP had "quality" or "good" images, this would be one of them.
Samsara (
talk •
contribs) 20:47, 23 January 2008 (UTC)reply
Very high quality and detailed image of vampire bat that meets the featured picture criteria. This image is used throughout many articles on wikipedia, and greatly depicts this famous creature.
Support for a bloodsucking little monster it sure is cute.
DurovaCharge! 02:04, 20 January 2008 (UTC)reply
Oppose Not very sharp, cut off at the top, and I can't really see much (do these things have wings?)--
HereToHelp 02:39, 20 January 2008 (UTC)reply
Is that really a question, or are you just suggesting that you can't clearly see the wings? (If it's really a question you could look at the articles). --
jjron (
talk) 07:08, 20 January 2008 (UTC)reply
Oppose Seems to me to be slightly artifacted, plus it's not composed very well.
Clegs (
talk) 03:31, 20 January 2008 (UTC)reply
Oppose - bad composition (feet cut off, I'd like to see how it's hanging), noisy, not sharp, harsh shadow. There could be much better photographs taken. —
Vanderdecken∴ ∫ξφ 11:55, 20 January 2008 (UTC)reply
Oppose It lacks the quality of something truly stunning and I don't like the composition and the lighting.
Chris.B 14:52, 20 January 2008 (UTC)reply
Oppose Feet are a must. --Sharkface217 01:58, 21 January 2008 (UTC)reply
Weak oppose. If WP had "quality" or "good" images, this would be one of them.
Samsara (
talk •
contribs) 20:47, 23 January 2008 (UTC)reply