Support —
Tomer T 21:57, 5 January 2007 (UTC)reply
Oppose because of weird photoshopped "shadow". How about letting us see the original image? --
Janke |
Talk 15:20, 21 January 2007 (UTC)reply
Oppose, too small, and you don't even have a good reason for your support for this as a featured picture. --
RandomOrca2 17:59, 21 January 2007 (UTC)reply
Oppose because the picture is too small and it has a creepy shadow. --♥Tohru Honda13♥Talk 18:59, 21 January 2007 (UTC)reply
Comment The pic is not too small for FP, it's 1299 by 431 pixels. The "rule" is that one dimension should be above 1000 pixels -
Adrian Pingstone 19:37, 21 January 2007 (UTC)reply
Oppose. I'd support if not for the weird shadow, and an even higher resolution would be nice --
frothT 20:50, 21 January 2007 (UTC)reply
Oppose per above. The size requirements can be increased if the picture is easily replaceable with a higher-quality one.
Trebor 22:31, 21 January 2007 (UTC)reply
Oppose per above. S.D.¿п? § 00:54, 22 January 2007 (UTC)reply
Oppose As per above. The shadow gave impression of blur until I saw full version.
Photonikonman 10:57, 22 January 2007 (UTC)reply
Oppose things that glow like that are usually evil artifacts from
FFXI. --
Iriseyes 17:25, 24 January 2007 (UTC)reply
Oppose due to shadow. JorcogaHi!04:10, Saturday, January 27 2007
Support —
Tomer T 21:57, 5 January 2007 (UTC)reply
Oppose because of weird photoshopped "shadow". How about letting us see the original image? --
Janke |
Talk 15:20, 21 January 2007 (UTC)reply
Oppose, too small, and you don't even have a good reason for your support for this as a featured picture. --
RandomOrca2 17:59, 21 January 2007 (UTC)reply
Oppose because the picture is too small and it has a creepy shadow. --♥Tohru Honda13♥Talk 18:59, 21 January 2007 (UTC)reply
Comment The pic is not too small for FP, it's 1299 by 431 pixels. The "rule" is that one dimension should be above 1000 pixels -
Adrian Pingstone 19:37, 21 January 2007 (UTC)reply
Oppose. I'd support if not for the weird shadow, and an even higher resolution would be nice --
frothT 20:50, 21 January 2007 (UTC)reply
Oppose per above. The size requirements can be increased if the picture is easily replaceable with a higher-quality one.
Trebor 22:31, 21 January 2007 (UTC)reply
Oppose per above. S.D.¿п? § 00:54, 22 January 2007 (UTC)reply
Oppose As per above. The shadow gave impression of blur until I saw full version.
Photonikonman 10:57, 22 January 2007 (UTC)reply
Oppose things that glow like that are usually evil artifacts from
FFXI. --
Iriseyes 17:25, 24 January 2007 (UTC)reply
Oppose due to shadow. JorcogaHi!04:10, Saturday, January 27 2007