Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 2 Jan 2011 at 16:31:57 (UTC)

Reason

nice light, good quality, interesting view

Articles in which this image appears

Großbottwar

FP category for this image

Wikipedia:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture

Creator

Felix König

• Support as nominator ---- Felix König ✉ 16:31, 24 December 2010 (UTC) reply
• 'Oppose'Weak SupportSupport too small for a FP. Sorry.-- ♫Greatorangepumpkin♫ T 16:35, 24 December 2010 (UTC) reply
  • Please be a little more specific. If by 'small', you're talking about resolution, the image is 1,450 × 2,700, which is well above minimum FP requirements (1000px on longest side). Jujutacular  ^talk 18:44, 24 December 2010 (UTC) reply
    • Yeah, I also don't understand. I think a resolution of 4MP is enough for FP and a lot bigger than the requirement. -- Felix König ✉ 17:45, 25 December 2010 (UTC) reply
    • I think GreatOrangePumpkin is talking about the size of the article. The article itself doesn't seem like the photo would have very much EV. -- AmericanXplorer13 ( talk) 22:42, 25 December 2010 (UTC) reply
      • I don't see any issues, why the perspective of this image should not be normal, not edgewise. And yes, forgot to mention, that this pic has too less EV, showing only a mansion somewhere in a district, somewhere in Ludwigsburg, somewhere in Germany, somwhere in Europe, somewhere in the Earth. This is my oppinion. Sorry again. Regards.-- ♫Greatorangepumpkin♫ T 15:27, 26 December 2010 (UTC) reply
      • Sorry to change my comment so much. But I support now. The reason for the changing is, that my computer spinned yesterday and two days ago: If I clicked this picture double times, the size was the same as in wikipedia. But now I see, that it is very large and absolutely OK to become FP. Regards.-- ♫Greatorangepumpkin♫ T 12:18, 27 December 2010 (UTC) reply
• I'll Support, but there does need to be more information on the page it's from to show it has good EV. I do like the picture though. Anoldtreeok ( talk) 22:58, 25 December 2010 (UTC) reply
• Support iff article is significantly expanded with translation from corresponding german article. The picture itself is quite good, with a lot of intriguing detail. I couldn't tell if the bird on the left side of the round clock is real or not. Purpy Pupple ( talk) 06:23, 26 December 2010 (UTC) reply
  • Sorry, I've got very little time at the moment. I tried to expand the article a bit, and it is now twice as long as before ;-) But I know it's still not very much. -- Felix König ✉ 11:47, 27 December 2010 (UTC) reply
  • The article has recently been considerably expanded [1], and I would interpret this as satisfying your request unless we hear from you again on this matter. Papa Lima Whiskey ( talk) 12:48, 1 January 2011 (UTC) reply
• Comment: I'm not quite sure about the contrast here. It seems a little bit on the dark side to me. – SMasters ( talk) 06:21, 27 December 2010 (UTC) reply
• Support Contrast is fine to avoid overexposure of white inserts. Papa Lima Whiskey ( talk) 18:03, 28 December 2010 (UTC) Prefer edit. Papa Lima Whiskey ( talk) 11:58, 31 December 2010 (UTC) reply

Comments on the edit, please. Makeemlighter ( talk) 22:26, 2 January 2011 (UTC) reply

• Prefer edit. Purpy Pupple ( talk) 04:56, 3 January 2011 (UTC) reply
• Edit better lightning-- ♫Greatorangepumpkin♫ T 10:45, 3 January 2011 (UTC) reply

Promoted File:Rathaus Großbottwar neu edit.jpg -- Makeemlighter ( talk) 15:07, 3 January 2011 (UTC) reply