Original - Maverick's or Mavericks is a world-famous
surfing location in
Northern California. After a strong winter storm in the northern
Pacific Ocean, waves can routinely crest at over 25 feet (8m) and top out at over 50 feet (15m). The
break is caused by an unusually-shaped underwater rock formation.Alt 1
Comment The nominated image is great! Yet I put mine low quality image as the lead image for
Mavericks (location). I did it because IMO my image that was made out of 4 images is more encyclopedic. It shows the break of a wave from the beginning to the end. May I please ask you while commenting on the nominated image to state your opinion about the lead. I am more than willing to replace my image with the nominated one, if you believe it will be a better lead for the article. Could you please also comment, if the title of the nomination should be changed to "Big waves surfing" ? Thanks.--
Mbz1 (
talk)
15:10, 28 February 2010 (UTC)reply
Comment The alternative was done by request of Wikimedia Commons reviewers. I personally prefer the original much more. It is more encyclopedic IMO.
Support original version. The out-of-focus area in lower left seems to be a closer wave, which is understandable. The edit in the alt version is clean, but makes the wave appear to get steeper again near the photographer for no apparent reason. --
Avenue (
talk)
20:32, 28 February 2010 (UTC)reply
The high resolution image was emailed to me as an attachment by the photographer himself. He changed the license on Flickr because I asked him to. I emailed the links to the image and to the articles image appears in to the photographer. So Shalom is fully aware of what's going on. --
Mbz1 (
talk)
22:23, 28 February 2010 (UTC)reply
The photographer has since begun uploading his own photos to Commons, at a similar resolution.
[1] We could ask him to upload the original of this photo himself too, if there is any doubt. --
Avenue (
talk)
10:09, 4 March 2010 (UTC)reply
Support either version, prefers edit. The blurred area in the original is distracting for me. I find the clone less distracting albeit it may not be a very accurate representation of the waves in this very small area. The nominator has done a good job in negotiating licensing terms with the creator. Photographing the Mavericks in this manner cannot be done from the coast. You need to be in a boat close by (as in this case, which is risky from a personal safety point of view) or hovering in a helicopter over the waves. It is rare that photos from these sources are freely licensed, so I find it is a quite unique contribution and great action shot (although the technical qualities of the photo could have been better). --
Slaunger (
talk)
10:16, 1 March 2010 (UTC)reply
Original - Maverick's or Mavericks is a world-famous
surfing location in
Northern California. After a strong winter storm in the northern
Pacific Ocean, waves can routinely crest at over 25 feet (8m) and top out at over 50 feet (15m). The
break is caused by an unusually-shaped underwater rock formation.Alt 1
Comment The nominated image is great! Yet I put mine low quality image as the lead image for
Mavericks (location). I did it because IMO my image that was made out of 4 images is more encyclopedic. It shows the break of a wave from the beginning to the end. May I please ask you while commenting on the nominated image to state your opinion about the lead. I am more than willing to replace my image with the nominated one, if you believe it will be a better lead for the article. Could you please also comment, if the title of the nomination should be changed to "Big waves surfing" ? Thanks.--
Mbz1 (
talk)
15:10, 28 February 2010 (UTC)reply
Comment The alternative was done by request of Wikimedia Commons reviewers. I personally prefer the original much more. It is more encyclopedic IMO.
Support original version. The out-of-focus area in lower left seems to be a closer wave, which is understandable. The edit in the alt version is clean, but makes the wave appear to get steeper again near the photographer for no apparent reason. --
Avenue (
talk)
20:32, 28 February 2010 (UTC)reply
The high resolution image was emailed to me as an attachment by the photographer himself. He changed the license on Flickr because I asked him to. I emailed the links to the image and to the articles image appears in to the photographer. So Shalom is fully aware of what's going on. --
Mbz1 (
talk)
22:23, 28 February 2010 (UTC)reply
The photographer has since begun uploading his own photos to Commons, at a similar resolution.
[1] We could ask him to upload the original of this photo himself too, if there is any doubt. --
Avenue (
talk)
10:09, 4 March 2010 (UTC)reply
Support either version, prefers edit. The blurred area in the original is distracting for me. I find the clone less distracting albeit it may not be a very accurate representation of the waves in this very small area. The nominator has done a good job in negotiating licensing terms with the creator. Photographing the Mavericks in this manner cannot be done from the coast. You need to be in a boat close by (as in this case, which is risky from a personal safety point of view) or hovering in a helicopter over the waves. It is rare that photos from these sources are freely licensed, so I find it is a quite unique contribution and great action shot (although the technical qualities of the photo could have been better). --
Slaunger (
talk)
10:16, 1 March 2010 (UTC)reply