An illustration for a 1901 edition of Mother Goose by a notable illustrator. Nominating all three illustrations by the same artist for this poem separately (per reviewers who prefer to review items separately). Restored version of
File:King of Hearts Mother Goose.jpg.
Support as nominator --Durova285 23:23, 29 July 2009 (UTC)reply
Question: Is it possible not to crop the bottom so tightly? SpencerT♦Nominate! 02:38, 30 July 2009 (UTC)reply
Cropped both the King and Queen according to the playing card notations at the corners of the images. That did mean cropping the king tightly at the bottom. The alternative was to sacrifice proportionality between those two images or a result that looks less like playing cards. Durova285 14:47, 30 July 2009 (UTC)reply
I would like a fraction more at the bottom, I have to admit: There's some lines awfully near the cutoff. Weak support current, Conditional full support if fixed.
Shoemaker's HolidayOver
184 FCs served 00:27, 3 August 2009 (UTC)reply
Okay, will try to have that up in the morning. Durova288 04:27, 3 August 2009 (UTC)reply
An illustration for a 1901 edition of Mother Goose by a notable illustrator. Nominating all three illustrations by the same artist for this poem separately (per reviewers who prefer to review items separately). Restored version of
File:King of Hearts Mother Goose.jpg.
Support as nominator --Durova285 23:23, 29 July 2009 (UTC)reply
Question: Is it possible not to crop the bottom so tightly? SpencerT♦Nominate! 02:38, 30 July 2009 (UTC)reply
Cropped both the King and Queen according to the playing card notations at the corners of the images. That did mean cropping the king tightly at the bottom. The alternative was to sacrifice proportionality between those two images or a result that looks less like playing cards. Durova285 14:47, 30 July 2009 (UTC)reply
I would like a fraction more at the bottom, I have to admit: There's some lines awfully near the cutoff. Weak support current, Conditional full support if fixed.
Shoemaker's HolidayOver
184 FCs served 00:27, 3 August 2009 (UTC)reply
Okay, will try to have that up in the morning. Durova288 04:27, 3 August 2009 (UTC)reply