Comment what's up with the dots at 100%? I don't believe there were any printing methods back in 1873 that created dots like that. Maybe there was a weird texture on the paper? Or maybe the scanner was set for the wrong setting (like maybe it was set to scan halftone)?-
Andrew c 04:18, 22 June 2007 (UTC)reply
Drat, you're right. I think something happened in the photocopying process (can't take archives out of a library) that messed it up. I'll withdraw the nomination, and get a clean, fresh copy. or, at least, confirm that the original looks like that.
Adam Cuerdentalk 04:50, 22 June 2007 (UTC)reply
Withdrawn by nominator pending better version/confirmation of appearance of originalNot promoted --
Makeemlighter (
talk) 03:36, 9 April 2012 (UTC)reply
Comment what's up with the dots at 100%? I don't believe there were any printing methods back in 1873 that created dots like that. Maybe there was a weird texture on the paper? Or maybe the scanner was set for the wrong setting (like maybe it was set to scan halftone)?-
Andrew c 04:18, 22 June 2007 (UTC)reply
Drat, you're right. I think something happened in the photocopying process (can't take archives out of a library) that messed it up. I'll withdraw the nomination, and get a clean, fresh copy. or, at least, confirm that the original looks like that.
Adam Cuerdentalk 04:50, 22 June 2007 (UTC)reply
Withdrawn by nominator pending better version/confirmation of appearance of originalNot promoted --
Makeemlighter (
talk) 03:36, 9 April 2012 (UTC)reply