Support original/Alt.1/Alt.2 as nominator --The herald 09:48, 25 April 2014 (UTC)reply
Comment - Below minimum resolution. In 2006 this would have been amazing. In 2014... —
Crisco 1492 (
talk) 09:55, 25 April 2014 (UTC)reply
Then how about the alternate..?? The herald 12:36, 25 April 2014 (UTC)reply
That might be worth considering. However, note that the date should most certainly not the date it was uploaded, but the date it was created. —
Crisco 1492 (
talk) 00:08, 26 April 2014 (UTC)reply
Supportalt 1Alt.2. But I actually think the colours and texture were a bit better on original.
Hafspajen (
talk) 11:09, 25 April 2014 (UTC)reply
@
Hafspajen: Can you please now specify which one you are supporting..?? Thank you.. The herald 15:10, 27 April 2014 (UTC)reply
Well, then it has to be alt 2.
Hafspajen (
talk) 15:19, 27 April 2014 (UTC)reply
Support alt 1 — But ditto re texture in orig. (And I wonder if there isn't also wheat flour in the bread.)
Sca (
talk) 13:38, 25 April 2014 (UTC)reply
Support the white balance correction of the original with the resolution from alt 1 (a theoretical alt 2). WB is clearly too warm in the original (which isn't actually the original, it's a derivative... confusing). It should be relatively straight forward to do this, but I'm not in a position to at the moment.
Ðiliff«»(Talk) 09:19, 26 April 2014 (UTC)reply
Support alt 2 until what Diliff has suggested is done. Correctness isn't as important as believable. Yet, I think these are indeed correct now
Saffron Blaze (
talk) 15:58, 26 April 2014 (UTC) (edit)
Saffron Blaze (
talk) 22:16, 26 April 2014 (UTC)reply
Its gonna be a mammoth task but how's the Alt.2...??The herald 16:33, 26 April 2014 (UTC)reply
Support (having stumbled here from
my FPC discussion page), alt 1 or original, as part of a balanced Wikipedia diet. — Cirt (
talk) 16:35, 26 April 2014 (UTC)reply
Alt 2 is also tasty. Clearly you were bread well. — Cirt (
talk) 16:32, 27 April 2014 (UTC)reply
Oppose Good image, but with so much doubt as to the correct colour, I'm not sure I trust any of them. Adam Cuerden(
talk) 21:51, 26 April 2014 (UTC)reply
Support ALT2. Lighting looks reasonable, resolution is up to par. Composition is lovely. —
Crisco 1492 (
talk) 01:28, 27 April 2014 (UTC)reply
Support — Transferring my support from Alt. 1 to Alt. 2.Sca (
talk) 14:25, 27 April 2014 (UTC)reply
Oppose per Adam.
Samsara (
FA •
FP) 09:16, 30 April 2014 (UTC)reply
Support original/Alt.1/Alt.2 as nominator --The herald 09:48, 25 April 2014 (UTC)reply
Comment - Below minimum resolution. In 2006 this would have been amazing. In 2014... —
Crisco 1492 (
talk) 09:55, 25 April 2014 (UTC)reply
Then how about the alternate..?? The herald 12:36, 25 April 2014 (UTC)reply
That might be worth considering. However, note that the date should most certainly not the date it was uploaded, but the date it was created. —
Crisco 1492 (
talk) 00:08, 26 April 2014 (UTC)reply
Supportalt 1Alt.2. But I actually think the colours and texture were a bit better on original.
Hafspajen (
talk) 11:09, 25 April 2014 (UTC)reply
@
Hafspajen: Can you please now specify which one you are supporting..?? Thank you.. The herald 15:10, 27 April 2014 (UTC)reply
Well, then it has to be alt 2.
Hafspajen (
talk) 15:19, 27 April 2014 (UTC)reply
Support alt 1 — But ditto re texture in orig. (And I wonder if there isn't also wheat flour in the bread.)
Sca (
talk) 13:38, 25 April 2014 (UTC)reply
Support the white balance correction of the original with the resolution from alt 1 (a theoretical alt 2). WB is clearly too warm in the original (which isn't actually the original, it's a derivative... confusing). It should be relatively straight forward to do this, but I'm not in a position to at the moment.
Ðiliff«»(Talk) 09:19, 26 April 2014 (UTC)reply
Support alt 2 until what Diliff has suggested is done. Correctness isn't as important as believable. Yet, I think these are indeed correct now
Saffron Blaze (
talk) 15:58, 26 April 2014 (UTC) (edit)
Saffron Blaze (
talk) 22:16, 26 April 2014 (UTC)reply
Its gonna be a mammoth task but how's the Alt.2...??The herald 16:33, 26 April 2014 (UTC)reply
Support (having stumbled here from
my FPC discussion page), alt 1 or original, as part of a balanced Wikipedia diet. — Cirt (
talk) 16:35, 26 April 2014 (UTC)reply
Alt 2 is also tasty. Clearly you were bread well. — Cirt (
talk) 16:32, 27 April 2014 (UTC)reply
Oppose Good image, but with so much doubt as to the correct colour, I'm not sure I trust any of them. Adam Cuerden(
talk) 21:51, 26 April 2014 (UTC)reply
Support ALT2. Lighting looks reasonable, resolution is up to par. Composition is lovely. —
Crisco 1492 (
talk) 01:28, 27 April 2014 (UTC)reply
Support — Transferring my support from Alt. 1 to Alt. 2.Sca (
talk) 14:25, 27 April 2014 (UTC)reply
Oppose per Adam.
Samsara (
FA •
FP) 09:16, 30 April 2014 (UTC)reply