Its surprising that so far we only have one featured picture of a waterfall. This one in Canada looks rather impressive and illustrates Takakkaw Falls. Perhaps more surprising, given that they are apparently the highest falls in Canada, the article at Della Falls has no illustration at all. -- Solipsist 12:11, 16 August 2005 (UTC)
- Nominate and support. - Solipsist 12:11, 16 August 2005 (UTC)
- Is there a higher resolution version available?
Enochlau
13:58, 16 August 2005 (UTC)
- I found a larger version and uploaded it with the same filename (compare the current picture with the
original pic).
Coffee
16:13, 16 August 2005 (UTC)
- Oppose. The details of the trees seems to be lost. Enochlau 06:19, 21 August 2005 (UTC)
- I found a larger version and uploaded it with the same filename (compare the current picture with the
original pic).
Coffee
16:13, 16 August 2005 (UTC)
- Support, even though it's not that big, because it's just so pretty. ^_^ Coffee 08:16, 20 August 2005 (UTC)
- Support. Striking image.--May the Force be with you! Shreshth91 ($ |-| r 3 $ |-| t |-|) 16:36, 20 August 2005 (UTC)
- Support - Wonderful shot. Sango 123 16:42, August 20, 2005 (UTC)
- Support Wow. Great photo. -- Barista | a/k/a マイケル | T/ C 06:21, 21 August 2005 (UTC)
- Deserving of support. - Mgm| (talk) 10:07, August 22, 2005 (UTC)
- Support--Looks good. -- ZeWrestler Talk 17:43, 22 August 2005 (UTC)
- Support. The comment on trees being lost is not that relevant, the camera simply isn't supposed to be focused there. -- user:zanimum
-
Support Great photo, but really should be in higher res. --
Fir0002 08:10, August 24, 2005 (UTC) - Weak Support. It looks too busy to me. From the trees to the rainbow to the actual falls i just think its too...busy. --
ScottyBoy900Q
∞
14:28, 25 August 2005 (UTC)
- Promoted Image:TakakkawFalls2.jpg This link is Broken 21:19, 1 September 2005 (UTC)
Its surprising that so far we only have one featured picture of a waterfall. This one in Canada looks rather impressive and illustrates Takakkaw Falls. Perhaps more surprising, given that they are apparently the highest falls in Canada, the article at Della Falls has no illustration at all. -- Solipsist 12:11, 16 August 2005 (UTC)
- Nominate and support. - Solipsist 12:11, 16 August 2005 (UTC)
- Is there a higher resolution version available?
Enochlau
13:58, 16 August 2005 (UTC)
- I found a larger version and uploaded it with the same filename (compare the current picture with the
original pic).
Coffee
16:13, 16 August 2005 (UTC)
- Oppose. The details of the trees seems to be lost. Enochlau 06:19, 21 August 2005 (UTC)
- I found a larger version and uploaded it with the same filename (compare the current picture with the
original pic).
Coffee
16:13, 16 August 2005 (UTC)
- Support, even though it's not that big, because it's just so pretty. ^_^ Coffee 08:16, 20 August 2005 (UTC)
- Support. Striking image.--May the Force be with you! Shreshth91 ($ |-| r 3 $ |-| t |-|) 16:36, 20 August 2005 (UTC)
- Support - Wonderful shot. Sango 123 16:42, August 20, 2005 (UTC)
- Support Wow. Great photo. -- Barista | a/k/a マイケル | T/ C 06:21, 21 August 2005 (UTC)
- Deserving of support. - Mgm| (talk) 10:07, August 22, 2005 (UTC)
- Support--Looks good. -- ZeWrestler Talk 17:43, 22 August 2005 (UTC)
- Support. The comment on trees being lost is not that relevant, the camera simply isn't supposed to be focused there. -- user:zanimum
-
Support Great photo, but really should be in higher res. --
Fir0002 08:10, August 24, 2005 (UTC)
- Weak Support. It looks too busy to me. From the trees to the rainbow to the actual falls i just think its too...busy. --
ScottyBoy900Q
∞
14:28, 25 August 2005 (UTC)
- Promoted Image:TakakkawFalls2.jpg This link is Broken 21:19, 1 September 2005 (UTC)