Strong Oppose -- Prefer a withdraw. Poorest lighting I have ever seen in any Taj Mahal pic. I had seen it in Agra, in a better light, at 5 o' clock in winter. Jim, never look in the WOW factor. It seems to be a curse on Taj Mahal's pics that they never have a place in FPs like
this buddy.
I had even tried before..--The herald14:29, 25 October 2014 (UTC)reply
Taj Mahal does looks different in sunset, sunrise - at night, and so on - it is actually quite famous for it. It has a very special glow, so many different pictures about it is quite in order.
Hafspajen (
talk)
14:50, 25 October 2014 (UTC)reply
Yep dude, I know that. But I'll Support edited version (only if you make it Alt.1) because of the better lighting. The current candidate is far below the expected qualities of the Taj Mahal (poorest lighting)..--The herald07:36, 26 October 2014 (UTC)reply
Comment For me, I will compare this image to mine
File:Taj Mahal 2012.jpg. And I see it falling short in all aspects apart from the sky. The sharpness is mediocre and the light and the resolution (of the actual Taj) are all not as good. --
Muhammad(talk)09:27, 26 October 2014 (UTC)reply
Muhammad, since you took this picture so it is reasonable that you will prefer your image. And as for Sharpness and light, it is FP level (I think). In your image the marbles looks brownish whereas the original color is white (although it varies with time of the day, but the original color is white). Cheers, JimCarter12:53, 26 October 2014 (UTC)reply
Nobody is flogging anyone. I love Muhammad, he is one of our most talented contributor, a truly good asset. He is a great photographer. We are only discussing an image - that's all.
Hafspajen (
talk)
14:28, 26 October 2014 (UTC)reply
The domes in the edit were indeed blown, any person can check that. Of course, I am biased for my image but it shows what is really possible in terms of sharpness. But enough from me, I will stop with my flogging ;) I'm amused to say the least. --
Muhammad(talk)19:44, 26 October 2014 (UTC)reply
Support alt More light is fine, but too much is not good. I uploaded over your alternative. I hope it is OK. Regards,
Yann (
talk)
16:03, 26 October 2014 (UTC)reply
Strong Oppose -- Prefer a withdraw. Poorest lighting I have ever seen in any Taj Mahal pic. I had seen it in Agra, in a better light, at 5 o' clock in winter. Jim, never look in the WOW factor. It seems to be a curse on Taj Mahal's pics that they never have a place in FPs like
this buddy.
I had even tried before..--The herald14:29, 25 October 2014 (UTC)reply
Taj Mahal does looks different in sunset, sunrise - at night, and so on - it is actually quite famous for it. It has a very special glow, so many different pictures about it is quite in order.
Hafspajen (
talk)
14:50, 25 October 2014 (UTC)reply
Yep dude, I know that. But I'll Support edited version (only if you make it Alt.1) because of the better lighting. The current candidate is far below the expected qualities of the Taj Mahal (poorest lighting)..--The herald07:36, 26 October 2014 (UTC)reply
Comment For me, I will compare this image to mine
File:Taj Mahal 2012.jpg. And I see it falling short in all aspects apart from the sky. The sharpness is mediocre and the light and the resolution (of the actual Taj) are all not as good. --
Muhammad(talk)09:27, 26 October 2014 (UTC)reply
Muhammad, since you took this picture so it is reasonable that you will prefer your image. And as for Sharpness and light, it is FP level (I think). In your image the marbles looks brownish whereas the original color is white (although it varies with time of the day, but the original color is white). Cheers, JimCarter12:53, 26 October 2014 (UTC)reply
Nobody is flogging anyone. I love Muhammad, he is one of our most talented contributor, a truly good asset. He is a great photographer. We are only discussing an image - that's all.
Hafspajen (
talk)
14:28, 26 October 2014 (UTC)reply
The domes in the edit were indeed blown, any person can check that. Of course, I am biased for my image but it shows what is really possible in terms of sharpness. But enough from me, I will stop with my flogging ;) I'm amused to say the least. --
Muhammad(talk)19:44, 26 October 2014 (UTC)reply
Support alt More light is fine, but too much is not good. I uploaded over your alternative. I hope it is OK. Regards,
Yann (
talk)
16:03, 26 October 2014 (UTC)reply