Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 19 Sep 2013 at 06:00:03 (UTC)
Original – Swami Vivekananda in London in December 1896
Reason
Vivekananda went to U.S. in 1893 and then moved to England in 1895. Though many photos of Vivekananda were taken at this time, only few photos were printed in color (mostly for promoting and using in posters, billboards), such as
File:Swami Vivekananda 1893 Scanned Image.jpg. The image nominated here was taken in 1896
"Encyclopedic value" - how much the image contributes to the reader's understanding of the topic. The image's omission from the Swami Vivekananda article itself means that this is not clear. Grandiose(
me,
talk,
contribs) 09:48, 9 September 2013 (UTC)reply
That makes sense- I think this nomination is a little premature. When you have the image securely placed in an article where it is adding value, then the image could be nominated here.
J Milburn (
talk)
10:23, 9 September 2013 (UTC)reply
Oppose until such time as encyclopedic value of this image is fixed (i.e. it is stable in a more pertinent article). Still curious about the lighting as well. —
Crisco 1492 (
talk)
13:09, 9 September 2013 (UTC)reply
Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 19 Sep 2013 at 06:00:03 (UTC)
Original – Swami Vivekananda in London in December 1896
Reason
Vivekananda went to U.S. in 1893 and then moved to England in 1895. Though many photos of Vivekananda were taken at this time, only few photos were printed in color (mostly for promoting and using in posters, billboards), such as
File:Swami Vivekananda 1893 Scanned Image.jpg. The image nominated here was taken in 1896
"Encyclopedic value" - how much the image contributes to the reader's understanding of the topic. The image's omission from the Swami Vivekananda article itself means that this is not clear. Grandiose(
me,
talk,
contribs) 09:48, 9 September 2013 (UTC)reply
That makes sense- I think this nomination is a little premature. When you have the image securely placed in an article where it is adding value, then the image could be nominated here.
J Milburn (
talk)
10:23, 9 September 2013 (UTC)reply
Oppose until such time as encyclopedic value of this image is fixed (i.e. it is stable in a more pertinent article). Still curious about the lighting as well. —
Crisco 1492 (
talk)
13:09, 9 September 2013 (UTC)reply