Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 20 Jan 2016 at 09:13:55 (UTC)
Original – Film flyer for Supir Istimewa, a 1954 Persari production which follows a man who passes as a chauffeur so he can win the love of a young village woman
Reason
High quality scan of a flyer for a notable film. Fortunately this one was in pretty good shape when I bought it.
Oppose - Lacks the "wow" factor I expect in a good movie poster. Scan is technically good, but the photos and presentation not on par with the previous posters. --
Janke |
Talk12:51, 10 January 2016 (UTC)reply
It's not a poster. It's a flyer, made to distribute quickly and cheaply. As for "wow"... the differences between Commons' and En-Wiki's FP processes have been discussed to death. Doubt more discussion would do any good here. —
Chris Woodrich (
talk)
13:44, 10 January 2016 (UTC)reply
Comment, leaning support: There's a lot of dirt spots, particularly the woman on the right has a lot of brown dots and white fibres on her, the man next to her less so but still a few smaller ones. Those seem like they should be cleaned. Adam Cuerden(
talk)16:24, 10 January 2016 (UTC)reply
Support I see where the quality of the content is considered quite poor, but the quality of the scan and the EV is quite high, thus my support.
Mattximus (
talk)
01:41, 13 January 2016 (UTC)reply
Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 20 Jan 2016 at 09:13:55 (UTC)
Original – Film flyer for Supir Istimewa, a 1954 Persari production which follows a man who passes as a chauffeur so he can win the love of a young village woman
Reason
High quality scan of a flyer for a notable film. Fortunately this one was in pretty good shape when I bought it.
Oppose - Lacks the "wow" factor I expect in a good movie poster. Scan is technically good, but the photos and presentation not on par with the previous posters. --
Janke |
Talk12:51, 10 January 2016 (UTC)reply
It's not a poster. It's a flyer, made to distribute quickly and cheaply. As for "wow"... the differences between Commons' and En-Wiki's FP processes have been discussed to death. Doubt more discussion would do any good here. —
Chris Woodrich (
talk)
13:44, 10 January 2016 (UTC)reply
Comment, leaning support: There's a lot of dirt spots, particularly the woman on the right has a lot of brown dots and white fibres on her, the man next to her less so but still a few smaller ones. Those seem like they should be cleaned. Adam Cuerden(
talk)16:24, 10 January 2016 (UTC)reply
Support I see where the quality of the content is considered quite poor, but the quality of the scan and the EV is quite high, thus my support.
Mattximus (
talk)
01:41, 13 January 2016 (UTC)reply