Comment: It would be incredibly useful if we could talk about the copyright status of the statue itself on the image page; especially as there is no freedom of panorama for statues in the United States.
J Milburn (
talk)
14:37, 9 June 2010 (UTC)reply
Oppose Too dark. Since the subject is the statue, the shot is too far away and too busy. The composition is a generic, square-on one that comes up short of having potential for being among Wikipedia’s best works.
Greg L (
talk)
23:59, 9 June 2010 (UTC)reply
Oppose The color balance seems too warm, and the composition is fairly ordinary. I wouldn't say the EV is dubious, just not outstanding.
Fletcher (
talk)
02:42, 11 June 2010 (UTC)reply
Withdrawn. I'll be taking criticism into account and possibly re-shooting another time. Don't want to waste any more of peoples' time however. JujutacularT ·
C18:57, 11 June 2010 (UTC)reply
Comment: It would be incredibly useful if we could talk about the copyright status of the statue itself on the image page; especially as there is no freedom of panorama for statues in the United States.
J Milburn (
talk)
14:37, 9 June 2010 (UTC)reply
Oppose Too dark. Since the subject is the statue, the shot is too far away and too busy. The composition is a generic, square-on one that comes up short of having potential for being among Wikipedia’s best works.
Greg L (
talk)
23:59, 9 June 2010 (UTC)reply
Oppose The color balance seems too warm, and the composition is fairly ordinary. I wouldn't say the EV is dubious, just not outstanding.
Fletcher (
talk)
02:42, 11 June 2010 (UTC)reply
Withdrawn. I'll be taking criticism into account and possibly re-shooting another time. Don't want to waste any more of peoples' time however. JujutacularT ·
C18:57, 11 June 2010 (UTC)reply