Spot Fetcher

Burnt highlights, low res, poor focus/sharpness

• Support Delisting -- Fir0002 www 08:13, 22 May 2006 (UTC) reply
• Delist As above -- liquidGhoul 08:34, 22 May 2006 (UTC) reply
• Weak delist. Fir is right of course but I also have sympathy with the reasons it was promoted. Alas, probably not enough to keep it as an FP ~ Veledan • Talk 17:22, 22 May 2006 (UTC) reply
• Delist. As above. More to the point I support delisting the whole Spot Fetcher article. What's the point of it - can I make an article about my pet? Cute dog though. -- jjron 10:16, 23 May 2006 (UTC) reply
• Delist per above, though it is a nice shot. -- bcasterline • talk 12:16, 23 May 2006 (UTC) reply
• Delist. Is this what the standards used to be? My God. Delist per above. -- Life is like a box of chocolates 22:11, 25 May 2006 (UTC) reply
• Delist. It is interesting to see the comments that Veledan linked to above. It just shows how much pickier FP is now. Witt y lama 16:53, 30 May 2006 (UTC) reply
• Delist. Very cute, however it is too small, and too blurry. -- Pharaoh Hound 13:14, 31 May 2006 (UTC) reply
• Keep. I don't think the shortcomings are sufficiently severe. - Samsara ( talk • contribs) 17:33, 3 June 2006 (UTC) reply
• delist size and everything else above. say1988 23:58, 7 June 2006 (UTC) reply

Image delisted ~ Veledan • Talk 23:15, 10 June 2006 (UTC) reply