Support Can't quite agree that it's "high quality". It's very grainy to me. BUT I support this as we aren't going to get a better picture, so the EV and historic nature of this picture makes it FP worthy in my eyes.
gazhiley 13:06, 21 January 2013 (UTC)reply
Support per the irreplaceable loophole as gazhiley pointed out. Cat-fivetc ---- 16:40, 24 January 2013 (UTC)reply
Support Grainy as anything, but alright for a historical image. Adam Cuerden(
talk) 00:16, 25 January 2013 (UTC)reply
Support Can't quite agree that it's "high quality". It's very grainy to me. BUT I support this as we aren't going to get a better picture, so the EV and historic nature of this picture makes it FP worthy in my eyes.
gazhiley 13:06, 21 January 2013 (UTC)reply
Support per the irreplaceable loophole as gazhiley pointed out. Cat-fivetc ---- 16:40, 24 January 2013 (UTC)reply
Support Grainy as anything, but alright for a historical image. Adam Cuerden(
talk) 00:16, 25 January 2013 (UTC)reply