Opposetoo small per criteria. Higher quality image is better, but I don't see the historical value which would require a B&W image. --
Leivick (
talk)
20:04, 12 December 2008 (UTC)reply
Oppose per Daniel J. Leivick. Since this is demonstrating snake handling, not historical snake handling a newer, better quality photograph could be produced. There seem to be a few new people around at FPC, welcome!
Noodle snacks (
talk)
01:29, 13 December 2008 (UTC)reply
Reluctant oppose Certainly large enough to fit the criteria (I wonder whether Leivick misread the information), but no particular reason is given why this needs to be a historical depiction; the practice still exists. Not enough photographic merit to stand on its own as an FP independent of special historical context.
DurovaCharge!03:17, 17 December 2008 (UTC)reply
Just to defend my initial oppose, I have to point out that a higher image was uploaded since I cast my initial vote. I still oppose do to lack of historical context. --
Leivick (
talk)
05:48, 17 December 2008 (UTC)reply
Opposetoo small per criteria. Higher quality image is better, but I don't see the historical value which would require a B&W image. --
Leivick (
talk)
20:04, 12 December 2008 (UTC)reply
Oppose per Daniel J. Leivick. Since this is demonstrating snake handling, not historical snake handling a newer, better quality photograph could be produced. There seem to be a few new people around at FPC, welcome!
Noodle snacks (
talk)
01:29, 13 December 2008 (UTC)reply
Reluctant oppose Certainly large enough to fit the criteria (I wonder whether Leivick misread the information), but no particular reason is given why this needs to be a historical depiction; the practice still exists. Not enough photographic merit to stand on its own as an FP independent of special historical context.
DurovaCharge!03:17, 17 December 2008 (UTC)reply
Just to defend my initial oppose, I have to point out that a higher image was uploaded since I cast my initial vote. I still oppose do to lack of historical context. --
Leivick (
talk)
05:48, 17 December 2008 (UTC)reply