Comment. I'm worried that this is not getting any attention; people may be unsure of its significance given the terse statements in the caption and reason. I wonder if you would be able to provide a pretty straightforward paragraph or so saying what this is actually showing, what that means to a layperson, and why you think it's particularly valuable for the article. --
jjron (
talk)
12:11, 11 March 2008 (UTC)reply
Some further quick thoughts that may or may not be relevant:
Axis labelling is sloppy (the x is labelled, albeit in a weird spot, the y isn't labelled at all).
Isn't it still standard to put arrowheads at the ends of the axes?
Comment. The animation itself is very good. It would benefit from a graph that is not as stretched on the y-axis. There is a problem on your graph in that the x-axis is labeled to the right of the one and the y-axis is not labeled at all. Consider labeling the axis on the right and the top of the graph. Overall a very clean job that shows the concept well.
victorrocha (
talk) 9:43, 12 March 2008 (UTC)
Oppose - A quite good animation but does not illustrate well the concept. I'm not sure how to do it better but I think the axes are not necessary and the curve could be simpler, without inflextions--
Alvesgaspar (
talk)
08:46, 13 March 2008 (UTC)reply
Comment. I'm worried that this is not getting any attention; people may be unsure of its significance given the terse statements in the caption and reason. I wonder if you would be able to provide a pretty straightforward paragraph or so saying what this is actually showing, what that means to a layperson, and why you think it's particularly valuable for the article. --
jjron (
talk)
12:11, 11 March 2008 (UTC)reply
Some further quick thoughts that may or may not be relevant:
Axis labelling is sloppy (the x is labelled, albeit in a weird spot, the y isn't labelled at all).
Isn't it still standard to put arrowheads at the ends of the axes?
Comment. The animation itself is very good. It would benefit from a graph that is not as stretched on the y-axis. There is a problem on your graph in that the x-axis is labeled to the right of the one and the y-axis is not labeled at all. Consider labeling the axis on the right and the top of the graph. Overall a very clean job that shows the concept well.
victorrocha (
talk) 9:43, 12 March 2008 (UTC)
Oppose - A quite good animation but does not illustrate well the concept. I'm not sure how to do it better but I think the axes are not necessary and the curve could be simpler, without inflextions--
Alvesgaspar (
talk)
08:46, 13 March 2008 (UTC)reply