Seattle Ferry
- Reason
- This is a very encyclopediac and clean picture.
- Articles this image appears in
- Seattle, Washington
- Creator
- Jamies ( talk · contribs · count)
- Support as nominator ComputerGuy890100 ( talk) 16:09, 28 January 2008 (UTC)
- Support Looks great. Caption might need some improvement. Muhammad (talk) 18:05, 28 January 2008 (UTC)
- Oppose due to low resolution. I'd be more forgiving if it wasn't such an easily reproduced photo. It would also be nice to have a wider view that shows more of the skyline. Cacophony ( talk) 18:33, 28 January 2008 (UTC)
- Neutral Very nice and sharp, with good coloring. As Cacophony said, though, something like this should be significantly higher-res. Clegs ( talk) 19:12, 28 January 2008 (UTC)
- Oppose strongly. Easily re-creatable photos like this need to be the best of the best. gren グレン 06:18, 30 January 2008 (UTC)
- Oppose per Grenavitar. Purple Is Pretty ( talk) 23:52, 3 February 2008 (UTC)
Not promoted MER-C 04:29, 4 February 2008 (UTC)
Seattle Ferry
- Reason
- This is a very encyclopediac and clean picture.
- Articles this image appears in
- Seattle, Washington
- Creator
- Jamies ( talk · contribs · count)
- Support as nominator ComputerGuy890100 ( talk) 16:09, 28 January 2008 (UTC)
- Support Looks great. Caption might need some improvement. Muhammad (talk) 18:05, 28 January 2008 (UTC)
- Oppose due to low resolution. I'd be more forgiving if it wasn't such an easily reproduced photo. It would also be nice to have a wider view that shows more of the skyline. Cacophony ( talk) 18:33, 28 January 2008 (UTC)
- Neutral Very nice and sharp, with good coloring. As Cacophony said, though, something like this should be significantly higher-res. Clegs ( talk) 19:12, 28 January 2008 (UTC)
- Oppose strongly. Easily re-creatable photos like this need to be the best of the best. gren グレン 06:18, 30 January 2008 (UTC)
- Oppose per Grenavitar. Purple Is Pretty ( talk) 23:52, 3 February 2008 (UTC)
Not promoted MER-C 04:29, 4 February 2008 (UTC)