Low temperature
scanning electron microscope magnification series for a
snow crystal, from 93x to 36,000xsingle columnwith rectangles
This image illustrates well the capabilities of a
scanning electron microscope (SEM). This is a magnification series for a
snow crystal, from 93x to 36,000x magnification, using a special low-temperature SEM (LT-SEM)
[1] to preserve the crystal. - BRIAN0918 18:19, 20 Mar 2005 (UTC)
Nominate and support either version. - BRIAN0918 18:19, 20 Mar 2005 (UTC)
I think this would work better if there were only a single column, instead of following the successive magnifications in the current zigzag fashion. I'll fiddle with it later today or tomorrow, unless someone beats me to it. —
Korath (
Talk) 19:00, Mar 20, 2005 (UTC)
You asked for it and you got it. I actually like this version more, both because the progression is more natural, and because I didn't have to crop each individual pic to make them all the same size (adds about 300px vertically to the image total). The only downside was that I had to compress it slightly more to get below the 2MB mark. -- BRIAN0918 19:37, 20 Mar 2005 (UTC)
I also created another version with rectangles indicating what part of the image was magnified. It's not 100% accurate, especially in the skewed one and the higher-magnification ones, but it isn't as necessary at those magnifications anyway. -- BRIAN0918 20:17, 20 Mar 2005 (UTC)
Thank you. Support either single-column version, preferring the one without rectangles. —
Korath (
Talk) 21:12, Mar 20, 2005 (UTC)
Support image with rectangles.
Denni☯ 21:22, 2005 Mar 21 (UTC)
Support columnar version with sub-magnification rectangle highlights.
James F.(talk) 23:06, 22 Mar 2005 (UTC)
Support columns with or without rectangles. Holy balls, that's the most intense snowflake I've ever seen.
Matthewcieplak 05:10, 24 Mar 2005 (UTC)
Low temperature
scanning electron microscope magnification series for a
snow crystal, from 93x to 36,000xsingle columnwith rectangles
This image illustrates well the capabilities of a
scanning electron microscope (SEM). This is a magnification series for a
snow crystal, from 93x to 36,000x magnification, using a special low-temperature SEM (LT-SEM)
[1] to preserve the crystal. - BRIAN0918 18:19, 20 Mar 2005 (UTC)
Nominate and support either version. - BRIAN0918 18:19, 20 Mar 2005 (UTC)
I think this would work better if there were only a single column, instead of following the successive magnifications in the current zigzag fashion. I'll fiddle with it later today or tomorrow, unless someone beats me to it. —
Korath (
Talk) 19:00, Mar 20, 2005 (UTC)
You asked for it and you got it. I actually like this version more, both because the progression is more natural, and because I didn't have to crop each individual pic to make them all the same size (adds about 300px vertically to the image total). The only downside was that I had to compress it slightly more to get below the 2MB mark. -- BRIAN0918 19:37, 20 Mar 2005 (UTC)
I also created another version with rectangles indicating what part of the image was magnified. It's not 100% accurate, especially in the skewed one and the higher-magnification ones, but it isn't as necessary at those magnifications anyway. -- BRIAN0918 20:17, 20 Mar 2005 (UTC)
Thank you. Support either single-column version, preferring the one without rectangles. —
Korath (
Talk) 21:12, Mar 20, 2005 (UTC)
Support image with rectangles.
Denni☯ 21:22, 2005 Mar 21 (UTC)
Support columnar version with sub-magnification rectangle highlights.
James F.(talk) 23:06, 22 Mar 2005 (UTC)
Support columns with or without rectangles. Holy balls, that's the most intense snowflake I've ever seen.
Matthewcieplak 05:10, 24 Mar 2005 (UTC)