Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 7 Jun 2011 at 21:51:41 (UTC)
- Reason
- An eye-catching and interesting image. Also historically siginifcant and unrepeatable.
- Articles in which this image appears
- Samuel Reshevsky
- FP category for this image
- Wikipedia:Featured pictures/History/Others
- Creator
- Kadel & Herbert
- Support as nominator -- Tomer T ( talk) 21:51, 29 May 2011 (UTC)
- Oppose. Very small and, though interesting, I can not see any kind of massively redeeming EV to compensate for the size. J Milburn ( talk) 14:20, 30 May 2011 (UTC)
SupportI find the EV spectacular, and yes it's small, but it's an irreproducible shot. Aaadddaaammm ( talk) 15:07, 30 May 2011 (UTC)OpposeIts not reproducible in the sense that no one will be taking another shot, but getting higher resolution is quite possible. It'd involve buying a print and scanning it at much higher resolution. Pity about the high cost though. JJ Harrison ( talk) 23:23, 30 May 2011 (UTC)- OK, fair point. My vote is stricken. Aaadddaaammm ( talk) 16:13, 31 May 2011 (UTC)
- Support Lovely image with high EV.-- Mbz1 ( talk) 17:02, 31 May 2011 (UTC)
- Comment
Is there a 2 Mpx rule here?Anyway, I just uploaded the largest version I could find, at 1.95 Mpx. I cannot attest to the sharpness or quality of this version since I merely found it online and had nothing to do with its creation otherwise. – Kerαunoςcopia◁ gala xies 06:04, 3 June 2011 (UTC)
- Just saw the 1000 px minimum requirement. – Kerαunoςcopia◁ gala xies 06:06, 3 June 2011 (UTC)
- Cool, changed my vote again: Support. Aaadddaaammm ( talk) 09:36, 5 June 2011 (UTC)
- Support Current revision. JJ Harrison ( talk) 09:49, 5 June 2011 (UTC)
- Comment: I am keeping my previous vote. Yes, it's bigger, but it's still not massive, nor is it great photography. If this was a photo of a child prodigy today, it would have been shot straight down. It's just not blowing me away. J Milburn ( talk) 10:06, 5 June 2011 (UTC)
- Oppose Per J Milburn's reasoning. JFitch (talk) 10:59, 5 June 2011 (UTC)
- I feel comfortable supporting this nomination. upstate NYer 01:12, 7 June 2011 (UTC)
- Support – Kerαunoςcopia◁ gala xies 02:00, 7 June 2011 (UTC)
- Support. Photos that tell a story are always very nice. -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 08:25, 7 June 2011 (UTC)
- Support -- George Chernilevsky talk 18:53, 9 June 2011 (UTC)
Promoted File:Samuel Reshevsky versus the World.JPG -- Makeemlighter ( talk) 11:13, 11 June 2011 (UTC)
Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 7 Jun 2011 at 21:51:41 (UTC)
- Reason
- An eye-catching and interesting image. Also historically siginifcant and unrepeatable.
- Articles in which this image appears
- Samuel Reshevsky
- FP category for this image
- Wikipedia:Featured pictures/History/Others
- Creator
- Kadel & Herbert
- Support as nominator -- Tomer T ( talk) 21:51, 29 May 2011 (UTC)
- Oppose. Very small and, though interesting, I can not see any kind of massively redeeming EV to compensate for the size. J Milburn ( talk) 14:20, 30 May 2011 (UTC)
SupportI find the EV spectacular, and yes it's small, but it's an irreproducible shot. Aaadddaaammm ( talk) 15:07, 30 May 2011 (UTC)OpposeIts not reproducible in the sense that no one will be taking another shot, but getting higher resolution is quite possible. It'd involve buying a print and scanning it at much higher resolution. Pity about the high cost though. JJ Harrison ( talk) 23:23, 30 May 2011 (UTC)- OK, fair point. My vote is stricken. Aaadddaaammm ( talk) 16:13, 31 May 2011 (UTC)
- Support Lovely image with high EV.-- Mbz1 ( talk) 17:02, 31 May 2011 (UTC)
- Comment
Is there a 2 Mpx rule here?Anyway, I just uploaded the largest version I could find, at 1.95 Mpx. I cannot attest to the sharpness or quality of this version since I merely found it online and had nothing to do with its creation otherwise. – Kerαunoςcopia◁ gala xies 06:04, 3 June 2011 (UTC)
- Just saw the 1000 px minimum requirement. – Kerαunoςcopia◁ gala xies 06:06, 3 June 2011 (UTC)
- Cool, changed my vote again: Support. Aaadddaaammm ( talk) 09:36, 5 June 2011 (UTC)
- Support Current revision. JJ Harrison ( talk) 09:49, 5 June 2011 (UTC)
- Comment: I am keeping my previous vote. Yes, it's bigger, but it's still not massive, nor is it great photography. If this was a photo of a child prodigy today, it would have been shot straight down. It's just not blowing me away. J Milburn ( talk) 10:06, 5 June 2011 (UTC)
- Oppose Per J Milburn's reasoning. JFitch (talk) 10:59, 5 June 2011 (UTC)
- I feel comfortable supporting this nomination. upstate NYer 01:12, 7 June 2011 (UTC)
- Support – Kerαunoςcopia◁ gala xies 02:00, 7 June 2011 (UTC)
- Support. Photos that tell a story are always very nice. -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 08:25, 7 June 2011 (UTC)
- Support -- George Chernilevsky talk 18:53, 9 June 2011 (UTC)
Promoted File:Samuel Reshevsky versus the World.JPG -- Makeemlighter ( talk) 11:13, 11 June 2011 (UTC)