Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 13 Jan 2016 at 21:44:33 (UTC)
- Reason
- Lead image in the stub article riding mower which I just created, and moderate EV in the article lawn mower. Large size at 6,020 × 4,016 pixels, and nice overhead angle, contribute to the value of the image.
- Articles in which this image appears
- Riding mower, Lawn mower
- FP category for this image
- Wikipedia:Featured pictures/Engineering and technology/Machinery
- Creator
- Pine
- Support as nominator – Pine ✉ 21:44, 31 December 2015 (UTC)
- Oppose While the size is good, the graininess and blur on the vehicle itself, especially the wheels, is not good... gazhiley 10:21, 8 January 2016 (UTC)
- Oppose – Although it's a large file, detail at full res is, as gazhiley notes, rather poor – due apparently to the camera's distance from the subject and the inclusion of wide lawn context. Further, the composition – overhead view of a faceless guy on a mower – lacks visual interest, IMO. Sca ( talk) 16:03, 10 January 2016 (UTC)
Not Promoted -- Armbrust The Homunculus 21:52, 13 January 2016 (UTC)
Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 13 Jan 2016 at 21:44:33 (UTC)
- Reason
- Lead image in the stub article riding mower which I just created, and moderate EV in the article lawn mower. Large size at 6,020 × 4,016 pixels, and nice overhead angle, contribute to the value of the image.
- Articles in which this image appears
- Riding mower, Lawn mower
- FP category for this image
- Wikipedia:Featured pictures/Engineering and technology/Machinery
- Creator
- Pine
- Support as nominator – Pine ✉ 21:44, 31 December 2015 (UTC)
- Oppose While the size is good, the graininess and blur on the vehicle itself, especially the wheels, is not good... gazhiley 10:21, 8 January 2016 (UTC)
- Oppose – Although it's a large file, detail at full res is, as gazhiley notes, rather poor – due apparently to the camera's distance from the subject and the inclusion of wide lawn context. Further, the composition – overhead view of a faceless guy on a mower – lacks visual interest, IMO. Sca ( talk) 16:03, 10 January 2016 (UTC)
Not Promoted -- Armbrust The Homunculus 21:52, 13 January 2016 (UTC)