Strong oppose The scene itself is quite beautiful, but the quality of the shot is terrible.
67.174.4.2 (
talk) 03:10, 9 August 2008 (UTC)reply
IPs do not have suffrage, even if the reasons are valid. If you wish to vote, please
create an account. —
Vanderdecken∴ ∫ξφ 10:39, 9 August 2008 (UTC)reply
Strong Oppose - nice enough subject, but the photo is low quality - unsharp, posterized, and large amounts of blur and chromatic aberration. —
Vanderdecken∴ ∫ξφ 10:39, 9 August 2008 (UTC)reply
Oppose per Vanderdecken. Will a photo of fireworks ever become a FP? :( – LATICS talk 19:53, 9 August 2008 (UTC)reply
Not promoted . --
John254 02:05, 14 August 2008 (UTC)reply
Strong oppose The scene itself is quite beautiful, but the quality of the shot is terrible.
67.174.4.2 (
talk) 03:10, 9 August 2008 (UTC)reply
IPs do not have suffrage, even if the reasons are valid. If you wish to vote, please
create an account. —
Vanderdecken∴ ∫ξφ 10:39, 9 August 2008 (UTC)reply
Strong Oppose - nice enough subject, but the photo is low quality - unsharp, posterized, and large amounts of blur and chromatic aberration. —
Vanderdecken∴ ∫ξφ 10:39, 9 August 2008 (UTC)reply
Oppose per Vanderdecken. Will a photo of fireworks ever become a FP? :( – LATICS talk 19:53, 9 August 2008 (UTC)reply
Not promoted . --
John254 02:05, 14 August 2008 (UTC)reply