The Ballroom at the Queluz National Palace

Reason

Not an easy picture to take. Requires lots of natural light entering inside, no other visitors wandering around the room, and dodging palace employees who wouldn't be happy about this picture. Above all, a stunning interior. Hús ö nd 01:35, 6 January 2008 (UTC) reply

Articles this image appears in

Queluz National Palace (yesterday's featured article on the main page)

Creator

Husond

• Support as nominator Hús ö nd 01:35, 6 January 2008 (UTC) reply
• Comment Is it just me, or is it pretty severely artifacted at full size? Clegs ( talk) 02:02, 6 January 2008 (UTC) reply
• Comment. It looks to be tilted, but I think it may just be the verticals, especially on the left. Perhaps it could do with a bit of perspective correction? -- jjron ( talk) 08:18, 6 January 2008 (UTC) reply
  • Might be wide angle distortion? Durova ^Charge! 02:07, 7 January 2008 (UTC) reply
• Oppose - sorry, too much chromatic aberration, soft focus, slight noise and compression artifacts, and the lamps and doors are too blown. This would benefit from HDR. This is a good photo for the article, but not FP-worthy IMO. — Vanderdecken∴ ∫ ξ φ 12:16, 6 January 2008 (UTC) reply
• Oppose - I thought about nominating it when I saw it in TFA, but declined upon closer inspection for the reasons given by Vanderdecken. —dgies ^t _c 16:45, 7 January 2008 (UTC) reply
• Oppose: Very unsharp at full resolution. — αἰτίας • discussion• 20:21, 7 January 2008 (UTC) reply
• Oppose artifacts immediately disqualify image Teque5 ( talk) 00:44, 11 January 2008 (UTC) reply

Not promoted -- jjron ( talk) 09:15, 12 January 2008 (UTC) reply