Weak support This is a more artistically pleasing view, but I would be more supportive of a lateral view to demo the anatomy. Not sure how this works but can we do a set of all four (male/female, lateral/dorsal)? ---
Coffeeand
crumbs 10:24, 24 June 2019 (UTC)reply
Weak support It seems a little blurry to me, but others don't seem to see that, so it may just be me. Adam Cuerden(
talk)Has about 6.7% of all
FPs 23:11, 24 June 2019 (UTC)reply
Comment I would be happy to vote support for a set containing the three other related images.
Geoffroi (
talk) 04:23, 25 June 2019 (UTC)reply
Support I agree with Adam that improved sharpness would be preferable, but I think that this is good enough. --Pine(✉) 06:28, 26 June 2019 (UTC)reply
Weak support. I agree with Adam that this probably isn't perfect, but I like the composition, and this is surely a highly valuable image for ID purposes.
Josh Milburn (
talk) 16:38, 29 June 2019 (UTC)reply
Weak support This is a more artistically pleasing view, but I would be more supportive of a lateral view to demo the anatomy. Not sure how this works but can we do a set of all four (male/female, lateral/dorsal)? ---
Coffeeand
crumbs 10:24, 24 June 2019 (UTC)reply
Weak support It seems a little blurry to me, but others don't seem to see that, so it may just be me. Adam Cuerden(
talk)Has about 6.7% of all
FPs 23:11, 24 June 2019 (UTC)reply
Comment I would be happy to vote support for a set containing the three other related images.
Geoffroi (
talk) 04:23, 25 June 2019 (UTC)reply
Support I agree with Adam that improved sharpness would be preferable, but I think that this is good enough. --Pine(✉) 06:28, 26 June 2019 (UTC)reply
Weak support. I agree with Adam that this probably isn't perfect, but I like the composition, and this is surely a highly valuable image for ID purposes.
Josh Milburn (
talk) 16:38, 29 June 2019 (UTC)reply