- Reason
- A very high quality photograph with excellent resolution. Have added#2 to the FPC title so I wouldn't have to overwrite an older (failed) FPC nom of the same species.
- Articles this image appears in
- Pisaura mirabilis
- Creator
- Richard Bartz
- Support as nominator -- Sasata (in WikiCup) ( talk) 15:43, 10 February 2009 (UTC)
- Support. Sharp, encyclopedic, good depth of field. Durova Charge! 19:38, 10 February 2009 (UTC)
- Support Good DOF, sharp, good lighting, good EV -- Muhammad (talk) 20:22, 10 February 2009 (UTC)
- Oppose: Yawn -- Tufacave ( talk) 21:51, 10 February 2009 (UTC)
- Strong Support to overwrite oppose by Tufacave.-- Mbz1 ( talk) 00:50, 11 February 2009 (UTC)
- Support per above, especially Mbz1. Zoo Fari 01:44, 11 February 2009 (UTC)
- Question How big is he/she? The article doesn't talk about sizes and I've never seen that plant before that I recall - Plantago lanceolata gives the massive range of 10–40 cm for the flower stems so that doesn't help. Mfield ( talk) 05:49, 11 February 2009 (UTC)
- Comment: Is the fact that the spider is off-center an issue? I think the actual spider looks great (I was wondering about it being quite small-looking, but I now see it is a small species) but the composition has thrown me a little. J Milburn ( talk) 18:17, 11 February 2009 (UTC)
- Support Nice clear picture. Terri G ( talk) 19:56, 12 February 2009 (UTC)
- Support: As much as I hate looking at spiders, this is a superb image. The whole of the spider is so clear and sharp. For what it's worth (being not much of a photographer or reviewer), I actually like the subject slightly off-centre. Not for everything; but it works here. So many macros/close-ups are dead centre, which can become a little dull. Maedin\ talk 20:06, 12 February 2009 (UTC)
Promoted File:Pisaura mirabilis on Plantago lanceolata.jpg MER-C 01:41, 17 February 2009 (UTC)
- Reason
- A very high quality photograph with excellent resolution. Have added#2 to the FPC title so I wouldn't have to overwrite an older (failed) FPC nom of the same species.
- Articles this image appears in
- Pisaura mirabilis
- Creator
- Richard Bartz
- Support as nominator -- Sasata (in WikiCup) ( talk) 15:43, 10 February 2009 (UTC)
- Support. Sharp, encyclopedic, good depth of field. Durova Charge! 19:38, 10 February 2009 (UTC)
- Support Good DOF, sharp, good lighting, good EV -- Muhammad (talk) 20:22, 10 February 2009 (UTC)
- Oppose: Yawn -- Tufacave ( talk) 21:51, 10 February 2009 (UTC)
- Strong Support to overwrite oppose by Tufacave.-- Mbz1 ( talk) 00:50, 11 February 2009 (UTC)
- Support per above, especially Mbz1. Zoo Fari 01:44, 11 February 2009 (UTC)
- Question How big is he/she? The article doesn't talk about sizes and I've never seen that plant before that I recall - Plantago lanceolata gives the massive range of 10–40 cm for the flower stems so that doesn't help. Mfield ( talk) 05:49, 11 February 2009 (UTC)
- Comment: Is the fact that the spider is off-center an issue? I think the actual spider looks great (I was wondering about it being quite small-looking, but I now see it is a small species) but the composition has thrown me a little. J Milburn ( talk) 18:17, 11 February 2009 (UTC)
- Support Nice clear picture. Terri G ( talk) 19:56, 12 February 2009 (UTC)
- Support: As much as I hate looking at spiders, this is a superb image. The whole of the spider is so clear and sharp. For what it's worth (being not much of a photographer or reviewer), I actually like the subject slightly off-centre. Not for everything; but it works here. So many macros/close-ups are dead centre, which can become a little dull. Maedin\ talk 20:06, 12 February 2009 (UTC)
Promoted File:Pisaura mirabilis on Plantago lanceolata.jpg MER-C 01:41, 17 February 2009 (UTC)