Without a key in the lock, the driver pins (blue) are pushed downwards, preventing the plug (yellow) from rotating.
When an incorrect key is inserted into the lock, the key pins (red) and driver pins (blue) do not align with the shear line; therefore, it does not allow the plug (yellow) to rotate.
When the correct key is inserted, the gaps between the key pins (red) and driver pins (blue) align with the edge of the plug (yellow).
With the gaps between the pins aligned with the shear line, the plug (yellow) can rotate freely.
Reason
I feel that this image shows how pin tumbler locks in a very easy-to-understand way. I am proposing these images as a {{FeaturedPictureSet}}.
SVG renders differently on different browsers and has font embedding isssues. Your images looked ok on my screen though.
deBivort23:48, 4 January 2009 (UTC)reply
That is very true, SVGs do tend to have font issues; however, they can be eliminated quite easily. Overall, SVG images are considered superior to (most) raster images.
--Pbroks13talk?03:59, 5 January 2009 (UTC)reply
People always say this, and then it's easy to find person X with browser Y that can't see half the fonts, or they render ugly. Raster is easier, and I don't really care about *infinite* scalability.
deBivort17:08, 6 January 2009 (UTC)reply
Yeah I agree with you, although it is also fairly trivial to render a raster image at at least 3000x2000ish, making it more than enough for just about any practical publishing use, a lot of people seem to create them at unreasonably low res.
Diliff |
(Talk)(Contribs)18:42, 6 January 2009 (UTC)reply
Comment I think these images can be, and should be, made into 1 or 2 images. You would lose nothing on technical grounds, and the sole page they are used on looks cumbersome.
smooth0707 (
talk)
04:26, 6 January 2009 (UTC)reply
Support But I'd like to see the colour of the incorrect key changed, IMHO there isn't enough contrast between it and and the rotated correct key directly below (since the lighting makes that dark grey)
Noodle snacks (
talk)
01:07, 7 January 2009 (UTC)reply
Oppose this as a featured set (and the concept of featured sets), Support if it is merged into a single image. It's far more usable, both in articles and as a reference for users to download if it's just one image. Can always link from the image page to separate images. --
jjron (
talk)
13:52, 9 January 2009 (UTC)reply
That could work, but that would mean that the caption would be incredibly long. And, I think that the descriptive captions really help with explaining the images. However, if you can figure a way to make it work with one image, please let me know.
--Pbroks13talk?19:16, 9 January 2009 (UTC)reply
Sure. Refer to my merged FP 'set'
File:Nectarine Fruit Development.jpg and its article usage. If images really belong in a set, this is how I believe they should be done - as one image. For yours, being as it's such a prominent part of that article, there's no reason the article itself couldn't contain a lengthy description which refers specifically to this image (aka the caption). --
jjron (
talk)
15:11, 10 January 2009 (UTC)reply
But how could you combine the zoom sequences of the
Mandelbrot set|200px set? Mathematically, they are all part of the same subject, but I do not consider an such a large image (petapixels and gigabytes) a viable alternative. The community
felt that the standalone image was iffy, but the zoom sequence was superb.--
HereToHelp(
talk to me)18:13, 10 January 2009 (UTC)reply
Without a key in the lock, the driver pins (blue) are pushed downwards, preventing the plug (yellow) from rotating.
When an incorrect key is inserted into the lock, the key pins (red) and driver pins (blue) do not align with the shear line; therefore, it does not allow the plug (yellow) to rotate.
When the correct key is inserted, the gaps between the key pins (red) and driver pins (blue) align with the edge of the plug (yellow).
With the gaps between the pins aligned with the shear line, the plug (yellow) can rotate freely.
Reason
I feel that this image shows how pin tumbler locks in a very easy-to-understand way. I am proposing these images as a {{FeaturedPictureSet}}.
SVG renders differently on different browsers and has font embedding isssues. Your images looked ok on my screen though.
deBivort23:48, 4 January 2009 (UTC)reply
That is very true, SVGs do tend to have font issues; however, they can be eliminated quite easily. Overall, SVG images are considered superior to (most) raster images.
--Pbroks13talk?03:59, 5 January 2009 (UTC)reply
People always say this, and then it's easy to find person X with browser Y that can't see half the fonts, or they render ugly. Raster is easier, and I don't really care about *infinite* scalability.
deBivort17:08, 6 January 2009 (UTC)reply
Yeah I agree with you, although it is also fairly trivial to render a raster image at at least 3000x2000ish, making it more than enough for just about any practical publishing use, a lot of people seem to create them at unreasonably low res.
Diliff |
(Talk)(Contribs)18:42, 6 January 2009 (UTC)reply
Comment I think these images can be, and should be, made into 1 or 2 images. You would lose nothing on technical grounds, and the sole page they are used on looks cumbersome.
smooth0707 (
talk)
04:26, 6 January 2009 (UTC)reply
Support But I'd like to see the colour of the incorrect key changed, IMHO there isn't enough contrast between it and and the rotated correct key directly below (since the lighting makes that dark grey)
Noodle snacks (
talk)
01:07, 7 January 2009 (UTC)reply
Oppose this as a featured set (and the concept of featured sets), Support if it is merged into a single image. It's far more usable, both in articles and as a reference for users to download if it's just one image. Can always link from the image page to separate images. --
jjron (
talk)
13:52, 9 January 2009 (UTC)reply
That could work, but that would mean that the caption would be incredibly long. And, I think that the descriptive captions really help with explaining the images. However, if you can figure a way to make it work with one image, please let me know.
--Pbroks13talk?19:16, 9 January 2009 (UTC)reply
Sure. Refer to my merged FP 'set'
File:Nectarine Fruit Development.jpg and its article usage. If images really belong in a set, this is how I believe they should be done - as one image. For yours, being as it's such a prominent part of that article, there's no reason the article itself couldn't contain a lengthy description which refers specifically to this image (aka the caption). --
jjron (
talk)
15:11, 10 January 2009 (UTC)reply
But how could you combine the zoom sequences of the
Mandelbrot set|200px set? Mathematically, they are all part of the same subject, but I do not consider an such a large image (petapixels and gigabytes) a viable alternative. The community
felt that the standalone image was iffy, but the zoom sequence was superb.--
HereToHelp(
talk to me)18:13, 10 January 2009 (UTC)reply