Comment. Sorry David, but this isn't FP quality for a number of reasons which others may like to elaborate. And for the record your reason is insufficient, your userpage is not an article, the information on the image page is poor (and images should really be uploaded to Commons), and you don't need to list your camera as a creator. Can I suggest you try
Picture peer review instead and spend a bit of time here seeing what is expected before nominating. --
jjron (
talk)
12:58, 6 September 2009 (UTC)reply
Oppose - the background is hazy, the horizon appears to slope, the bird is indistinct, the scene is not especially attractive or dramatic, and the blue of the sea appears to be darker than normal. SilkTork *
YES!18:34, 6 September 2009 (UTC)reply
Comment. Sorry David, but this isn't FP quality for a number of reasons which others may like to elaborate. And for the record your reason is insufficient, your userpage is not an article, the information on the image page is poor (and images should really be uploaded to Commons), and you don't need to list your camera as a creator. Can I suggest you try
Picture peer review instead and spend a bit of time here seeing what is expected before nominating. --
jjron (
talk)
12:58, 6 September 2009 (UTC)reply
Oppose - the background is hazy, the horizon appears to slope, the bird is indistinct, the scene is not especially attractive or dramatic, and the blue of the sea appears to be darker than normal. SilkTork *
YES!18:34, 6 September 2009 (UTC)reply