Support Edited version --
Fir0002 12:21, August 18, 2005 (UTC)
Support, edited version is much brighter and more appealing.
Phoenix2 02:14, August 19, 2005 (UTC)
Support original - A great illustration for the topic. Again, Fir0002, the enhanced version is more striking, but it now looks unnatural, and the background has become too prominent. Perhaps somewhere between the two images would be better. (Donovan|
Geocachernemesis|Interact) 03:08, 20 August 2005 (UTC)reply
Support the original image.
144.137.244.4 07:47, 20 August 2005 (UTC)reply
Support either version.
Sango123 16:52, August 20, 2005 (UTC)
Support original.
Enochlau 06:20, 21 August 2005 (UTC)reply
Support original.—
Encephalon |
ζ 05:03:48, 2005-08-22 (UTC)
Support original. While I don't immediately think "unnatural", the colours our reminiscent of 1960s Kodachrome technique. --
user:zanimum
Oppose. I dont eally know what to say, it just doesnt grab my eye at all. Maybe a front shot I would appreciate more. --
ScottyBoy900Q∞ 14:29, 25 August 2005 (UTC)reply
Promoted Image:Phalacrocorax-auritus-007.jpg 12/1 -- 9 votes for orginal version, 2 votes for edited version, 1 vote for either version, 1 vote opposed --
JtkieferT |
@ |
C ----- 06:09, August 29, 2005 (UTC)
Support Edited version --
Fir0002 12:21, August 18, 2005 (UTC)
Support, edited version is much brighter and more appealing.
Phoenix2 02:14, August 19, 2005 (UTC)
Support original - A great illustration for the topic. Again, Fir0002, the enhanced version is more striking, but it now looks unnatural, and the background has become too prominent. Perhaps somewhere between the two images would be better. (Donovan|
Geocachernemesis|Interact) 03:08, 20 August 2005 (UTC)reply
Support the original image.
144.137.244.4 07:47, 20 August 2005 (UTC)reply
Support either version.
Sango123 16:52, August 20, 2005 (UTC)
Support original.
Enochlau 06:20, 21 August 2005 (UTC)reply
Support original.—
Encephalon |
ζ 05:03:48, 2005-08-22 (UTC)
Support original. While I don't immediately think "unnatural", the colours our reminiscent of 1960s Kodachrome technique. --
user:zanimum
Oppose. I dont eally know what to say, it just doesnt grab my eye at all. Maybe a front shot I would appreciate more. --
ScottyBoy900Q∞ 14:29, 25 August 2005 (UTC)reply
Promoted Image:Phalacrocorax-auritus-007.jpg 12/1 -- 9 votes for orginal version, 2 votes for edited version, 1 vote for either version, 1 vote opposed --
JtkieferT |
@ |
C ----- 06:09, August 29, 2005 (UTC)