Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 10 Feb 2013 at 21:43:23 (UTC)
Original – An aerial side view of the
Parque Central Complex, showcasing the two towers, the residential buildings, the east of
Caracas in the background and the surrounding areas at the south of the complex, including the Francisco Fajardo highway and the botanic garden of the
Central University of Venezuela.
Reason
One of the finest images of the
Parque Central Complex in contrast with its surroundings. I'd like the FP community to measure the potential of this image, wich, in my opinion, has a great quantity of encyclopedic value.
Support as nominator --—
ΛΧΣ21 21:43, 1 February 2013 (UTC)reply
Weak oppose lacks sharpness. --Pine✉ 18:20, 3 February 2013 (UTC)reply
Oppose per Pine, but also the long deep shadows obscure the ability to see anything at bottom centre of the picture... Needs to be re-taken when the sun is overhead, or at least higher than it was at this time.
gazhiley 12:38, 5 February 2013 (UTC)reply
Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 10 Feb 2013 at 21:43:23 (UTC)
Original – An aerial side view of the
Parque Central Complex, showcasing the two towers, the residential buildings, the east of
Caracas in the background and the surrounding areas at the south of the complex, including the Francisco Fajardo highway and the botanic garden of the
Central University of Venezuela.
Reason
One of the finest images of the
Parque Central Complex in contrast with its surroundings. I'd like the FP community to measure the potential of this image, wich, in my opinion, has a great quantity of encyclopedic value.
Support as nominator --—
ΛΧΣ21 21:43, 1 February 2013 (UTC)reply
Weak oppose lacks sharpness. --Pine✉ 18:20, 3 February 2013 (UTC)reply
Oppose per Pine, but also the long deep shadows obscure the ability to see anything at bottom centre of the picture... Needs to be re-taken when the sun is overhead, or at least higher than it was at this time.
gazhiley 12:38, 5 February 2013 (UTC)reply