From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
File:SSM10260.JPG
Our rose
  • Comment, it is a fine image, but it is not linked in any article. It is a criteria that it adds significantly to the article. It is not a criteria that it is a beutiful image. -- Vidarlo 12:52, 24 December 2005 (UTC) reply
  • Comment: First, I think this is wrong attitude. One should find a article the image adds to before proposing it as a FP. Second, I can't really think of any articles that'd be significantly improved by this image, at least until we get the species of the plant, and so. There is images of roses out there, better than this. Look in the Rose article. See no need for more images. And those who are there, are better than this So no, don't link it. I'd say delete it. -- Vidarlo 21:01, 29 December 2005 (UTC) reply

Not promoted Raven4x4x 05:54, 4 January 2006 (UTC) reply

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
File:SSM10260.JPG
Our rose
  • Comment, it is a fine image, but it is not linked in any article. It is a criteria that it adds significantly to the article. It is not a criteria that it is a beutiful image. -- Vidarlo 12:52, 24 December 2005 (UTC) reply
  • Comment: First, I think this is wrong attitude. One should find a article the image adds to before proposing it as a FP. Second, I can't really think of any articles that'd be significantly improved by this image, at least until we get the species of the plant, and so. There is images of roses out there, better than this. Look in the Rose article. See no need for more images. And those who are there, are better than this So no, don't link it. I'd say delete it. -- Vidarlo 21:01, 29 December 2005 (UTC) reply

Not promoted Raven4x4x 05:54, 4 January 2006 (UTC) reply


Videos

Youtube | Vimeo | Bing

Websites

Google | Yahoo | Bing

Encyclopedia

Google | Yahoo | Bing

Facebook