Oppose These lenses are not transparent, not purple. See
[1] and
[2] for instance.
Nick-D (
talk) 08:37, 17 August 2021 (UTC)reply
Nick-D, this is common for a multi-coated lens
[3],
[4], which most lenses are these days
[5]. At ~45 degree angle one sees the reflection off of the lens coating. There are many examples on the web
[6]. Here are two versions of the same lens, with and without multi-coating
[7], description
[8]. The tint can also be blue or green
[9]. I have 3 lenses that do this, one of them reflects the same color as the nom image.
Bammesk (
talk) 03:11, 18 August 2021 (UTC)reply
Oppose Good quality, but a routine product photo, limited EV. --
Tagooty (
talk) 10:39, 17 August 2021 (UTC)reply
You'll have to explain that one to me. We have an article on the very camera itself. We have a good-quality picture of that very camera. How on Earth is that "limited EV"? The
featured picture criteria itself states that an image has more encyclopedic value (often abbreviated to "EV" or "enc" in discussions) if it contributes strongly to a single article, rather than contributing weakly to many. --
Veggies (talk) 00:02, 24 August 2021 (UTC)reply
Limited in that only a few photographers interested in Olympus cameras will read the article. Limited compared to more popular brands, and compared to other articles on a river or a mountain or a town. --
Tagooty (
talk) 03:05, 24 August 2021 (UTC)reply
Oppose Agree with above. --
Janke |
Talk 14:13, 17 August 2021 (UTC)reply
Support – It is what it is: a very good-quality photo of a camera. If we're going to have electronic products in and of themselves as featured pictures, I can't see why this one wouldn't qualify. --
Veggies (talk) 00:02, 24 August 2021 (UTC)reply
Promoted File:Olympus E-M1 Mark III Zuiko 12-100mm.jpg --
ArmbrustTheHomunculus 18:52, 24 August 2021 (UTC)reply
Oppose These lenses are not transparent, not purple. See
[1] and
[2] for instance.
Nick-D (
talk) 08:37, 17 August 2021 (UTC)reply
Nick-D, this is common for a multi-coated lens
[3],
[4], which most lenses are these days
[5]. At ~45 degree angle one sees the reflection off of the lens coating. There are many examples on the web
[6]. Here are two versions of the same lens, with and without multi-coating
[7], description
[8]. The tint can also be blue or green
[9]. I have 3 lenses that do this, one of them reflects the same color as the nom image.
Bammesk (
talk) 03:11, 18 August 2021 (UTC)reply
Oppose Good quality, but a routine product photo, limited EV. --
Tagooty (
talk) 10:39, 17 August 2021 (UTC)reply
You'll have to explain that one to me. We have an article on the very camera itself. We have a good-quality picture of that very camera. How on Earth is that "limited EV"? The
featured picture criteria itself states that an image has more encyclopedic value (often abbreviated to "EV" or "enc" in discussions) if it contributes strongly to a single article, rather than contributing weakly to many. --
Veggies (talk) 00:02, 24 August 2021 (UTC)reply
Limited in that only a few photographers interested in Olympus cameras will read the article. Limited compared to more popular brands, and compared to other articles on a river or a mountain or a town. --
Tagooty (
talk) 03:05, 24 August 2021 (UTC)reply
Oppose Agree with above. --
Janke |
Talk 14:13, 17 August 2021 (UTC)reply
Support – It is what it is: a very good-quality photo of a camera. If we're going to have electronic products in and of themselves as featured pictures, I can't see why this one wouldn't qualify. --
Veggies (talk) 00:02, 24 August 2021 (UTC)reply
Promoted File:Olympus E-M1 Mark III Zuiko 12-100mm.jpg --
ArmbrustTheHomunculus 18:52, 24 August 2021 (UTC)reply