Support --
Andrei (
talk) 20:52, 12 November 2021 (UTC)reply
Support --
Yann (
talk) 11:01, 13 November 2021 (UTC)reply
Support --
Janke |
Talk 17:00, 13 November 2021 (UTC)reply
Oppose - visible JPEG artifacts and posterisation, especially in the large dark bit about two thirds down and on the left. Not even close to a FP-worthy reproduction.
MER-C 19:15, 15 November 2021 (UTC)reply
Oppose – per MER-C. I had not seen the artifacts, but I thought the image was soft and the small file size of 608KB was questionable (for 3700 x 6200 pixels).
Bammesk (
talk) 01:37, 16 November 2021 (UTC)reply
Indeed, thanks for pointing that out. Struck my vote, but I'll definitely support technically a better version. --
Janke |
Talk 19:45, 16 November 2021 (UTC)reply
Support --
Andrei (
talk) 20:52, 12 November 2021 (UTC)reply
Support --
Yann (
talk) 11:01, 13 November 2021 (UTC)reply
Support --
Janke |
Talk 17:00, 13 November 2021 (UTC)reply
Oppose - visible JPEG artifacts and posterisation, especially in the large dark bit about two thirds down and on the left. Not even close to a FP-worthy reproduction.
MER-C 19:15, 15 November 2021 (UTC)reply
Oppose – per MER-C. I had not seen the artifacts, but I thought the image was soft and the small file size of 608KB was questionable (for 3700 x 6200 pixels).
Bammesk (
talk) 01:37, 16 November 2021 (UTC)reply
Indeed, thanks for pointing that out. Struck my vote, but I'll definitely support technically a better version. --
Janke |
Talk 19:45, 16 November 2021 (UTC)reply