Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 1 Apr 2021 at 13:07:11 (UTC)
Original – Oil painting by Iranian painter showing symbols of
Nowruz across the history of
Persia.
Reason
Not only this free work is of a pretty good technical standard and suitable resolution, it is used in various articles showing its EV. This oil painting depicts the culture & history of
Nowruz ceremony.
Oppose – This being en-WP, use in non-English articles doesn't count. It is used in one article
here but the EV is weak, see
FP criterion #5. It doesn't contribute to or enhance the article in a definitive way. For example if the article or its subsections did cover Nowruz related art, then it could have EV. On a sidenote: the image was added to the article on March 22, FP criterion #5 suggests waiting at least 7 days.
Bammesk (
talk)
02:58, 23 March 2021 (UTC)reply
EV: @
Bammesk and
Buidhe: I would like to turn your kind attention towards the fact that, among other things, the painting contains goldfish, water bowl and Sabze, all being the parts of the Haft-sin custom. The painting is depicting these things in an artistic manner. Actually this painting includes "Fire, Earth, Air, Water, and the three life forms of Humans, Animals and Plants." So I guess it is indeed adding to the understanding of the readers hence has EV. --
Mhhosseintalk06:19, 24 March 2021 (UTC)reply
The image is primarily an artistic depiction, rather than an informative depiction. The text of the article(s) don't delve into art though.
Bammesk (
talk)
03:31, 25 March 2021 (UTC)reply
Throughout the human history, the best method for describing (giving information) on cultural events/symbols had near always been via art. I don't get the point why you say this symbolic painting does not have encyclopedic value. --
Mhhosseintalk05:44, 27 March 2021 (UTC)reply
Oppose This is a lovely painting, though not terribly informative (EV). Also, this digital rendition of the painting is not that high-quality. (Unsharp at full res etc.)
Calliopejen1 (
talk)
18:05, 31 March 2021 (UTC)reply
Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 1 Apr 2021 at 13:07:11 (UTC)
Original – Oil painting by Iranian painter showing symbols of
Nowruz across the history of
Persia.
Reason
Not only this free work is of a pretty good technical standard and suitable resolution, it is used in various articles showing its EV. This oil painting depicts the culture & history of
Nowruz ceremony.
Oppose – This being en-WP, use in non-English articles doesn't count. It is used in one article
here but the EV is weak, see
FP criterion #5. It doesn't contribute to or enhance the article in a definitive way. For example if the article or its subsections did cover Nowruz related art, then it could have EV. On a sidenote: the image was added to the article on March 22, FP criterion #5 suggests waiting at least 7 days.
Bammesk (
talk)
02:58, 23 March 2021 (UTC)reply
EV: @
Bammesk and
Buidhe: I would like to turn your kind attention towards the fact that, among other things, the painting contains goldfish, water bowl and Sabze, all being the parts of the Haft-sin custom. The painting is depicting these things in an artistic manner. Actually this painting includes "Fire, Earth, Air, Water, and the three life forms of Humans, Animals and Plants." So I guess it is indeed adding to the understanding of the readers hence has EV. --
Mhhosseintalk06:19, 24 March 2021 (UTC)reply
The image is primarily an artistic depiction, rather than an informative depiction. The text of the article(s) don't delve into art though.
Bammesk (
talk)
03:31, 25 March 2021 (UTC)reply
Throughout the human history, the best method for describing (giving information) on cultural events/symbols had near always been via art. I don't get the point why you say this symbolic painting does not have encyclopedic value. --
Mhhosseintalk05:44, 27 March 2021 (UTC)reply
Oppose This is a lovely painting, though not terribly informative (EV). Also, this digital rendition of the painting is not that high-quality. (Unsharp at full res etc.)
Calliopejen1 (
talk)
18:05, 31 March 2021 (UTC)reply